Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process
Background Adding, omitting or changing outcomes after a systematic review protocol is published can result in bias because it increases the potential for unacknowledged or post hoc revisions of the planned analyses. The main objective of this study was to look for discrepancies between primary outc...
Hauptverfasser: | Kirkham, J, Altman, D, Williamson, P |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Sprache: | English |
Veröffentlicht: |
Public Library of Science
2010
|
Ähnliche Einträge
-
Bias due to changes in specified outcomes during the systematic review process.
von: Jamie J Kirkham, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2010-03-01) -
Outcome reporting bias in trials: A methodological approach for assessment and adjustment in systematic reviews
von: Kirkham, J, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2018) -
The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews.
von: Kirkham, J, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2010) -
Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews.
von: Saini, P, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2014) -
Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated review.
von: Kerry Dwan, et al.
Veröffentlicht: (2013-01-01)