Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games
It has become an accepted paradigm that humans have "prosocial preferences" that lead to higher levels of cooperation than those that would maximize their personal financial gain. However, the existence of prosocial preferences has been inferred post hoc from the results of economic games,...
Автори: | Burton-Chellew, M, West, S |
---|---|
Формат: | Journal article |
Мова: | English |
Опубліковано: |
National Academy of Sciences
2012
|
Схожі ресурси
Схожі ресурси
-
Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games.
за авторством: Burton-Chellew, M, та інші
Опубліковано: (2013) -
Resistance to extreme strategies, rather than prosocial preferences, can explain human cooperation in public goods games.
за авторством: Kümmerli, R, та інші
Опубліковано: (2010) -
Payoff-based learning explains the decline in cooperation in public goods games
за авторством: Burton-Chellew, M, та інші
Опубліковано: (2015) -
Payoff-based learning best explains the rate of decline in cooperation across 237 public-goods games
за авторством: Burton-Chellew, M, та інші
Опубліковано: (2021) -
Pseudocompetition among groups increases human cooperation in a public-goods game
за авторством: Burton-Chellew, M, та інші
Опубліковано: (2012)