Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games
It has become an accepted paradigm that humans have "prosocial preferences" that lead to higher levels of cooperation than those that would maximize their personal financial gain. However, the existence of prosocial preferences has been inferred post hoc from the results of economic games,...
Principais autores: | Burton-Chellew, M, West, S |
---|---|
Formato: | Journal article |
Idioma: | English |
Publicado em: |
National Academy of Sciences
2012
|
Registros relacionados
-
Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games.
por: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Publicado em: (2013) -
Resistance to extreme strategies, rather than prosocial preferences, can explain human cooperation in public goods games.
por: Kümmerli, R, et al.
Publicado em: (2010) -
Payoff-based learning explains the decline in cooperation in public goods games
por: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Publicado em: (2015) -
Payoff-based learning best explains the rate of decline in cooperation across 237 public-goods games
por: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Publicado em: (2021) -
Pseudocompetition among groups increases human cooperation in a public-goods game
por: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Publicado em: (2012)