Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games

Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games

Show other versions (1)

It has become an accepted paradigm that humans have "prosocial preferences" that lead to higher levels of cooperation than those that would maximize their personal financial gain. However, the existence of prosocial preferences has been inferred post hoc from the results of economic games,...

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors:	Burton-Chellew, M, West, S
Format:	Journal article
Jezik:	English
Izdano:	National Academy of Sciences 2012

Podobne knjige/članki

Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games.
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Resistance to extreme strategies, rather than prosocial preferences, can explain human cooperation in public goods games.
od: Kümmerli, R, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

Payoff-based learning explains the decline in cooperation in public goods games
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2015)

Payoff-based learning best explains the rate of decline in cooperation across 237 public-goods games
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2021)

Pseudocompetition among groups increases human cooperation in a public-goods game
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

Pseudocompetition among groups increases human cooperation in a public-goods game
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

Conditional cooperation and confusion in public-goods experiments
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2016)

The Strategy Method Risks Conflating Confusion with a Social Preference for Conditional Cooperation in Public Goods Games
od: Maxwell N. Burton-Chellew, et al.
Izdano: (2022-10-01)

Self-interested learning is more important than fair-minded conditional cooperation in public-goods games
od: Maxwell N. Burton-Chellew, et al.
Izdano: (2022-01-01)

Burton-Chellew et al. 2016 PNAS : conditional cooperation and confusion in public-goods experiments
od: Burton-Chellew, M
Izdano: (2016)

Evidence for strategic cooperation in humans
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2017)

Social learning and the demise of costly cooperation in humans
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2017)

Cooperation in humans: competition between groups and proximate emotions
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

Cooperation in humans: competition between groups and proximate emotions
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2010)

Preference and strategy in proposer's prosocial giving in the ultimatum game.
od: Misato Inaba, et al.
Izdano: (2018-01-01)

Correlates of Cooperation in a One-Shot High-Stakes Televised Prisoners' Dilemma
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2012)

Coexistence of cooperation and defection in public goods games.
od: Archetti, M, et al.
Izdano: (2011)

The black box as a control for payoff-based learning in economic games
od: Burton-Chellew, MN, et al.
Izdano: (2022)

Evolution of conditional cooperation in public good games
od: Balaraju Battu, et al.
Izdano: (2020-05-01)

Combined inequality in wealth and risk leads to disaster in the climate change game
od: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Human behavioral ecology
od: West, SA, et al.
Izdano: (2013)

Variance, norms and cooperative behavior in public goods games
od: Guangrong Wang, et al.
Izdano: (2024-03-01)

Evolution of cooperation and consistent personalities in public goods games
od: Mohammad Salahshour
Izdano: (2021-12-01)

Cooperation in Public Goods Games: Stay, But Not for Too Long
od: Lucas Wardil, et al.
Izdano: (2017-08-01)

Human cooperation in changing groups in a large-scale public goods game
od: Kasper Otten, et al.
Izdano: (2022-10-01)

The Black Box as a Control for Payoff-Based Learning in Economic Games
od: Maxwell N. Burton-Chellew, et al.
Izdano: (2022-11-01)

Choosing to cooperate: Modelling public goods games with team reasoning
od: Elsenbroich, C, et al.
Izdano: (2020)

The Influence of Fine Distribution and Compensation on Cooperation in Public Goods Game
od: Yong Shen, et al.
Izdano: (2024-12-01)

Evolutionary Cooperation in Networked Public Goods Game with Dependency Groups
od: Xuzhen Zhu, et al.
Izdano: (2019-01-01)

Cooperation dynamics in public goods games with evolving cognitive bias
od: Ji Quan, et al.
Izdano: (2023-12-01)

Cooperation and Coordination in Threshold Public Goods Games with Asymmetric Players
od: Xinmiao An, et al.
Izdano: (2023-12-01)

Effects of Relatedness on the Evolution of Cooperation in Nonlinear Public Goods Games
od: Kira Coder Gylling, et al.
Izdano: (2018-11-01)

Group-Level Selection Increases Cooperation in the Public Goods Game.
od: Catherine C Eckel, et al.
Izdano: (2016-01-01)

The study on the role of dedicators on promoting cooperation in public goods game.
od: Zhenghong Wu, et al.
Izdano: (2021-01-01)

Role of investment heterogeneity in the cooperation on spatial public goods game.
od: Wu-Jie Yuan, et al.
Izdano: (2014-01-01)

Evolution of Cooperation in Public Goods Games with Stochastic Opting-Out
od: Alexander G. Ginsberg, et al.
Izdano: (2018-12-01)

Cooperation as a volunteer's dilemma and the strategy of conflict in public goods games.
od: Archetti, M
Izdano: (2009)

Cooperation in spatial public good games depends on the locality effects of game, adaptation, and punishment
od: Isamu Okada, et al.
Izdano: (2021-04-01)

Explaining cooperation and commitment in repeated games
od: Fudenberg, Drew
Izdano: (2011)

Computer games and prosocial behaviour.
od: Friederike Mengel
Izdano: (2014-01-01)