Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games
It has become an accepted paradigm that humans have "prosocial preferences" that lead to higher levels of cooperation than those that would maximize their personal financial gain. However, the existence of prosocial preferences has been inferred post hoc from the results of economic games,...
Những tác giả chính: | Burton-Chellew, M, West, S |
---|---|
Định dạng: | Journal article |
Ngôn ngữ: | English |
Được phát hành: |
National Academy of Sciences
2012
|
Những quyển sách tương tự
-
Prosocial preferences do not explain human cooperation in public-goods games.
Bằng: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Được phát hành: (2013) -
Resistance to extreme strategies, rather than prosocial preferences, can explain human cooperation in public goods games.
Bằng: Kümmerli, R, et al.
Được phát hành: (2010) -
Payoff-based learning explains the decline in cooperation in public goods games
Bằng: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Được phát hành: (2015) -
Payoff-based learning best explains the rate of decline in cooperation across 237 public-goods games
Bằng: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Được phát hành: (2021) -
Pseudocompetition among groups increases human cooperation in a public-goods game
Bằng: Burton-Chellew, M, et al.
Được phát hành: (2012)