God, being, pathos: Abraham Joshua Heschel's theological rejoinder to Heidegger
<p style="text-align:justify;">Martin Heidegger’s philosophy has elicited many theological responses; some enthusiastic, others critical. In this essay I provide an organized and critical analysis of Abraham Joshua Heschel’s theological critique of and rejoinder to the thought of th...
Hoofdauteur: | |
---|---|
Formaat: | Journal article |
Gepubliceerd in: |
Brill Academic Publishers
2018
|
_version_ | 1826280544114049024 |
---|---|
author | Herskowitz, D |
author_facet | Herskowitz, D |
author_sort | Herskowitz, D |
collection | OXFORD |
description | <p style="text-align:justify;">Martin Heidegger’s philosophy has elicited many theological responses; some enthusiastic, others critical. In this essay I provide an organized and critical analysis of Abraham Joshua Heschel’s theological critique of and rejoinder to the thought of the German philosopher. By looking at Heschel’s 1965 Who is Man? as well as earlier and later texts, I demonstrate the way in which Heschel presents his biblical theology as an alternative to Heidegger’s philosophy.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:15:17Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:7aa078bb-af46-4db0-b84b-a0d70c407e76 |
institution | University of Oxford |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:15:17Z |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Brill Academic Publishers |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:7aa078bb-af46-4db0-b84b-a0d70c407e762022-03-26T20:45:18ZGod, being, pathos: Abraham Joshua Heschel's theological rejoinder to HeideggerJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7aa078bb-af46-4db0-b84b-a0d70c407e76Symplectic Elements at OxfordBrill Academic Publishers2018Herskowitz, D <p style="text-align:justify;">Martin Heidegger’s philosophy has elicited many theological responses; some enthusiastic, others critical. In this essay I provide an organized and critical analysis of Abraham Joshua Heschel’s theological critique of and rejoinder to the thought of the German philosopher. By looking at Heschel’s 1965 Who is Man? as well as earlier and later texts, I demonstrate the way in which Heschel presents his biblical theology as an alternative to Heidegger’s philosophy.</p> |
spellingShingle | Herskowitz, D God, being, pathos: Abraham Joshua Heschel's theological rejoinder to Heidegger |
title | God, being, pathos: Abraham Joshua Heschel's theological rejoinder to Heidegger |
title_full | God, being, pathos: Abraham Joshua Heschel's theological rejoinder to Heidegger |
title_fullStr | God, being, pathos: Abraham Joshua Heschel's theological rejoinder to Heidegger |
title_full_unstemmed | God, being, pathos: Abraham Joshua Heschel's theological rejoinder to Heidegger |
title_short | God, being, pathos: Abraham Joshua Heschel's theological rejoinder to Heidegger |
title_sort | god being pathos abraham joshua heschel s theological rejoinder to heidegger |
work_keys_str_mv | AT herskowitzd godbeingpathosabrahamjoshuaheschelstheologicalrejoindertoheidegger |