Evaluation of seven commercial antigen detection tests for Giardia and Cryptosporidium in stool samples.

Stool samples from patients with abdominal symptoms were used to evaluate different copro-diagnostic assays for the detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium. Results from microscopical examination following conventional stool concentration and direct fluorescent-antibody methods were compared with v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weitzel, T, Dittrich, S, Möhl, I, Adusu, E, Jelinek, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2006
Description
Summary:Stool samples from patients with abdominal symptoms were used to evaluate different copro-diagnostic assays for the detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium. Results from microscopical examination following conventional stool concentration and direct fluorescent-antibody methods were compared with various commercially available immunochromatographic and enzyme immunoassays. Of 220 samples, 45 were positive for Giardia and 17 for Cryptosporidium. For Giardia, the sensitivities obtained by Ridascreen Giardia, Rida Quick Giardia, Rida Quick Combi and Giardia-Strip were 82%, 80%, 80% and 44%, respectively. For Cryptosporidium, the sensitivities obtained by Rida Quick Cryptosporidium, Ridascreen Cryptosporidium, Rida Quick Combi and Cryptosporidium-Strip were 88%, 82%, 82% and 75%, respectively. The specificity of all tests was > or = 98%. Other intestinal parasites were present in 68 samples, but cross-reactions with other protozoan or helminthic parasites were not observed. Overall, the copro-antigen assays were less time-consuming and easier to perform, but were less sensitive than conventional microscopical methods. Thus, these tests might be a useful addition to, but not a substitute for microscopical methods in the diagnosis of travel-associated giardiasis and cryptosporidiosis.