A computer-aided algorithm to quantitatively predict lymph node status on MRI in rectal cancer.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the principle of supporting radiologists by using a computer algorithm to quantitatively analyse MRI morphological features used by radiologists to predict the presence or absence of metastatic disease in local lymph nodes in rectal cancer. METHOD...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2012
|
| _version_ | 1797077299032489984 |
|---|---|
| author | Tse, D Joshi, N Anderson, E Brady, M Gleeson, F |
| author_facet | Tse, D Joshi, N Anderson, E Brady, M Gleeson, F |
| author_sort | Tse, D |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the principle of supporting radiologists by using a computer algorithm to quantitatively analyse MRI morphological features used by radiologists to predict the presence or absence of metastatic disease in local lymph nodes in rectal cancer. METHODS: A computer algorithm was developed to extract and quantify the following morphological features from MR images: chemical shift artefact; relative mean signal intensity; signal heterogeneity; and nodal size (volume or maximum diameter). Computed predictions on nodal involvement were generated using quantified features in isolation or in combinations. Accuracies of the predictions were assessed against a set of 43 lymph nodes, determined by radiologists as benign (20 nodes) or malignant (23 nodes). RESULTS: Predictions using combinations of quantified features were more accurate than predictions using individual features (0.67-0.86 vs 0.58-0.77, respectively). The algorithm was more accurate when three-dimensional images were used (0.58-0.86) than when only middle image slices (two-dimensional) were used (0.47-0.72). Maximum node diameter was more accurate than node volume in representing the nodal size feature; combinations including maximum node diameter gave accuracies up to 0.91. CONCLUSION: We have developed a computer algorithm that can support radiologists by quantitatively analysing morphological features of lymph nodes on MRI in the context of rectal cancer nodal staging. We have shown that this algorithm can combine these quantitative indices to generate computed predictions of nodal status which closely match radiological assessment. This study provides support for the feasibility of computer-assisted reading in nodal staging, but requires further refinement and validation with larger data sets. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:15:58Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:7ad77b68-654d-40d1-ae75-d323551beaef |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:15:58Z |
| publishDate | 2012 |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:7ad77b68-654d-40d1-ae75-d323551beaef2022-03-26T20:46:40ZA computer-aided algorithm to quantitatively predict lymph node status on MRI in rectal cancer.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7ad77b68-654d-40d1-ae75-d323551beaefEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Tse, DJoshi, NAnderson, EBrady, MGleeson, F OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the principle of supporting radiologists by using a computer algorithm to quantitatively analyse MRI morphological features used by radiologists to predict the presence or absence of metastatic disease in local lymph nodes in rectal cancer. METHODS: A computer algorithm was developed to extract and quantify the following morphological features from MR images: chemical shift artefact; relative mean signal intensity; signal heterogeneity; and nodal size (volume or maximum diameter). Computed predictions on nodal involvement were generated using quantified features in isolation or in combinations. Accuracies of the predictions were assessed against a set of 43 lymph nodes, determined by radiologists as benign (20 nodes) or malignant (23 nodes). RESULTS: Predictions using combinations of quantified features were more accurate than predictions using individual features (0.67-0.86 vs 0.58-0.77, respectively). The algorithm was more accurate when three-dimensional images were used (0.58-0.86) than when only middle image slices (two-dimensional) were used (0.47-0.72). Maximum node diameter was more accurate than node volume in representing the nodal size feature; combinations including maximum node diameter gave accuracies up to 0.91. CONCLUSION: We have developed a computer algorithm that can support radiologists by quantitatively analysing morphological features of lymph nodes on MRI in the context of rectal cancer nodal staging. We have shown that this algorithm can combine these quantitative indices to generate computed predictions of nodal status which closely match radiological assessment. This study provides support for the feasibility of computer-assisted reading in nodal staging, but requires further refinement and validation with larger data sets. |
| spellingShingle | Tse, D Joshi, N Anderson, E Brady, M Gleeson, F A computer-aided algorithm to quantitatively predict lymph node status on MRI in rectal cancer. |
| title | A computer-aided algorithm to quantitatively predict lymph node status on MRI in rectal cancer. |
| title_full | A computer-aided algorithm to quantitatively predict lymph node status on MRI in rectal cancer. |
| title_fullStr | A computer-aided algorithm to quantitatively predict lymph node status on MRI in rectal cancer. |
| title_full_unstemmed | A computer-aided algorithm to quantitatively predict lymph node status on MRI in rectal cancer. |
| title_short | A computer-aided algorithm to quantitatively predict lymph node status on MRI in rectal cancer. |
| title_sort | computer aided algorithm to quantitatively predict lymph node status on mri in rectal cancer |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tsed acomputeraidedalgorithmtoquantitativelypredictlymphnodestatusonmriinrectalcancer AT joshin acomputeraidedalgorithmtoquantitativelypredictlymphnodestatusonmriinrectalcancer AT andersone acomputeraidedalgorithmtoquantitativelypredictlymphnodestatusonmriinrectalcancer AT bradym acomputeraidedalgorithmtoquantitativelypredictlymphnodestatusonmriinrectalcancer AT gleesonf acomputeraidedalgorithmtoquantitativelypredictlymphnodestatusonmriinrectalcancer AT tsed computeraidedalgorithmtoquantitativelypredictlymphnodestatusonmriinrectalcancer AT joshin computeraidedalgorithmtoquantitativelypredictlymphnodestatusonmriinrectalcancer AT andersone computeraidedalgorithmtoquantitativelypredictlymphnodestatusonmriinrectalcancer AT bradym computeraidedalgorithmtoquantitativelypredictlymphnodestatusonmriinrectalcancer AT gleesonf computeraidedalgorithmtoquantitativelypredictlymphnodestatusonmriinrectalcancer |