On the power of the conditional likelihood ratio and related tests for weak-instrument robust inference

Power curves of the Conditional Likelihood Ratio (CLR) and related tests for testing H0:β = β0 in linear models with a single endogenous variable, y = xβ+u, estimated using potentially weak instrumental variables have been presented for two different designs. One design keeps the variance matrix of...

Popoln opis

Bibliografske podrobnosti
Main Authors: Van de Sijpe, N, Windmeijer, F
Format: Journal article
Jezik:English
Izdano: Elsevier 2022
_version_ 1826309894122242048
author Van de Sijpe, N
Windmeijer, F
author_facet Van de Sijpe, N
Windmeijer, F
author_sort Van de Sijpe, N
collection OXFORD
description Power curves of the Conditional Likelihood Ratio (CLR) and related tests for testing H0:β = β0 in linear models with a single endogenous variable, y = xβ+u, estimated using potentially weak instrumental variables have been presented for two different designs. One design keeps the variance matrix of the structural and first-stage errors, Σ, constant, the other instead keeps the variance matrix of the reduced-form and first-stage errors, Ω, constant. The values of Σ govern the endogeneity features of the model. The fixed-Ω design changes these endogeneity features with changing values of β in a way that makes it less suitable for an analysis of the behaviour of the tests in low to moderate endogeneity settings, or when β and the correlation of the structural and first-stage errors, ρuv, have the same sign. At larger values of |β|, the fixed-Ω design implicitly selects values for Σ where the power of the CLR test is high. We further show that the Likelihood Ratio statistic is identical to the t0(βb L) 2 statistic as proposed by Mills et al. (2014), where βb L is the Liml estimator. In fixedΣ design Monte Carlo simulations, we find that Liml- and Fuller-based conditional Wald tests and the Fuller-based conditional t 2 0 test are more powerful than the CLR test when the degree of endogeneity is low to moderate. The conditional Wald tests are further the most powerful of these tests when β and ρuv have the same sign. We show that in the fixed-Ω design, setting β0 = 0 and the diagonal elements of Ω equal to 1 is not without loss of generality, unlike in the fixed-Σ design.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:42:35Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:7b4c8dd7-699e-42a7-a53a-1c3b657d7893
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:42:35Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:7b4c8dd7-699e-42a7-a53a-1c3b657d78932023-05-02T12:47:17ZOn the power of the conditional likelihood ratio and related tests for weak-instrument robust inferenceJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7b4c8dd7-699e-42a7-a53a-1c3b657d7893EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2022Van de Sijpe, NWindmeijer, FPower curves of the Conditional Likelihood Ratio (CLR) and related tests for testing H0:β = β0 in linear models with a single endogenous variable, y = xβ+u, estimated using potentially weak instrumental variables have been presented for two different designs. One design keeps the variance matrix of the structural and first-stage errors, Σ, constant, the other instead keeps the variance matrix of the reduced-form and first-stage errors, Ω, constant. The values of Σ govern the endogeneity features of the model. The fixed-Ω design changes these endogeneity features with changing values of β in a way that makes it less suitable for an analysis of the behaviour of the tests in low to moderate endogeneity settings, or when β and the correlation of the structural and first-stage errors, ρuv, have the same sign. At larger values of |β|, the fixed-Ω design implicitly selects values for Σ where the power of the CLR test is high. We further show that the Likelihood Ratio statistic is identical to the t0(βb L) 2 statistic as proposed by Mills et al. (2014), where βb L is the Liml estimator. In fixedΣ design Monte Carlo simulations, we find that Liml- and Fuller-based conditional Wald tests and the Fuller-based conditional t 2 0 test are more powerful than the CLR test when the degree of endogeneity is low to moderate. The conditional Wald tests are further the most powerful of these tests when β and ρuv have the same sign. We show that in the fixed-Ω design, setting β0 = 0 and the diagonal elements of Ω equal to 1 is not without loss of generality, unlike in the fixed-Σ design.
spellingShingle Van de Sijpe, N
Windmeijer, F
On the power of the conditional likelihood ratio and related tests for weak-instrument robust inference
title On the power of the conditional likelihood ratio and related tests for weak-instrument robust inference
title_full On the power of the conditional likelihood ratio and related tests for weak-instrument robust inference
title_fullStr On the power of the conditional likelihood ratio and related tests for weak-instrument robust inference
title_full_unstemmed On the power of the conditional likelihood ratio and related tests for weak-instrument robust inference
title_short On the power of the conditional likelihood ratio and related tests for weak-instrument robust inference
title_sort on the power of the conditional likelihood ratio and related tests for weak instrument robust inference
work_keys_str_mv AT vandesijpen onthepoweroftheconditionallikelihoodratioandrelatedtestsforweakinstrumentrobustinference
AT windmeijerf onthepoweroftheconditionallikelihoodratioandrelatedtestsforweakinstrumentrobustinference