The Medicalization of Love: Response to Critics

In 2015, we published an article entitled "The Medicalization of Love," in which we argued that both good and bad consequences could be expected to follow from love's medicalization, depending on how the process unfolded. A flurry of commentaries followed; here we offer some prelimina...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Earp, B, Sandberg, A, Savulescu, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2016
_version_ 1826280717852606464
author Earp, B
Sandberg, A
Savulescu, J
author_facet Earp, B
Sandberg, A
Savulescu, J
author_sort Earp, B
collection OXFORD
description In 2015, we published an article entitled "The Medicalization of Love," in which we argued that both good and bad consequences could be expected to follow from love's medicalization, depending on how the process unfolded. A flurry of commentaries followed; here we offer some preliminary thoughts in reply to the more substantial of the criticisms that were raised. We focus in particular on the nature of love itself as well as the role it plays (or should play) in our lives; we also touch on a number of practical issues concerning the likely effects of any plausible "real-life" love drugs and conclude with a call for careful regulation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:17:54Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:7b7ce6e6-a7fb-44d6-88ae-797202b7731d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:17:54Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:7b7ce6e6-a7fb-44d6-88ae-797202b7731d2022-03-26T20:50:57ZThe Medicalization of Love: Response to CriticsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7b7ce6e6-a7fb-44d6-88ae-797202b7731dEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordCambridge University Press2016Earp, BSandberg, ASavulescu, JIn 2015, we published an article entitled "The Medicalization of Love," in which we argued that both good and bad consequences could be expected to follow from love's medicalization, depending on how the process unfolded. A flurry of commentaries followed; here we offer some preliminary thoughts in reply to the more substantial of the criticisms that were raised. We focus in particular on the nature of love itself as well as the role it plays (or should play) in our lives; we also touch on a number of practical issues concerning the likely effects of any plausible "real-life" love drugs and conclude with a call for careful regulation.
spellingShingle Earp, B
Sandberg, A
Savulescu, J
The Medicalization of Love: Response to Critics
title The Medicalization of Love: Response to Critics
title_full The Medicalization of Love: Response to Critics
title_fullStr The Medicalization of Love: Response to Critics
title_full_unstemmed The Medicalization of Love: Response to Critics
title_short The Medicalization of Love: Response to Critics
title_sort medicalization of love response to critics
work_keys_str_mv AT earpb themedicalizationofloveresponsetocritics
AT sandberga themedicalizationofloveresponsetocritics
AT savulescuj themedicalizationofloveresponsetocritics
AT earpb medicalizationofloveresponsetocritics
AT sandberga medicalizationofloveresponsetocritics
AT savulescuj medicalizationofloveresponsetocritics