COMPARISON OF LIGHT QUARK AND CHARM QUARK FRAGMENTATION

Separate samples of charm quark and light quark (u, d, s) jets have been isolated in an experiment studying e+e- annihilations at s = 29 GeV. The results come from data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 111 pb-1 collected by the High Resolution Spectrometer. Differences were observed in c...

Täydet tiedot

Bibliografiset tiedot
Päätekijät: Kesten, P, Akerlof, C, Bonvicini, G, Chapman, J, Errede, D, Harnew, N, Meyer, D, Nitz, D, Seidl, A, Thun, R, Trinko, T, Willutzky, M, Derrick, M, Kooijman, P, Loos, J, Musgrave, B, Price, L, Schlereth, J, Sugano, K, Weiss, J, Wood, D, Baringer, P, Blockus, D, Brabson, B, Gray, S
Aineistotyyppi: Journal article
Kieli:English
Julkaistu: 1985
_version_ 1826280843583160320
author Kesten, P
Akerlof, C
Bonvicini, G
Chapman, J
Errede, D
Harnew, N
Meyer, D
Nitz, D
Seidl, A
Thun, R
Trinko, T
Willutzky, M
Derrick, M
Kooijman, P
Loos, J
Musgrave, B
Price, L
Schlereth, J
Sugano, K
Weiss, J
Wood, D
Baringer, P
Blockus, D
Brabson, B
Gray, S
author_facet Kesten, P
Akerlof, C
Bonvicini, G
Chapman, J
Errede, D
Harnew, N
Meyer, D
Nitz, D
Seidl, A
Thun, R
Trinko, T
Willutzky, M
Derrick, M
Kooijman, P
Loos, J
Musgrave, B
Price, L
Schlereth, J
Sugano, K
Weiss, J
Wood, D
Baringer, P
Blockus, D
Brabson, B
Gray, S
author_sort Kesten, P
collection OXFORD
description Separate samples of charm quark and light quark (u, d, s) jets have been isolated in an experiment studying e+e- annihilations at s = 29 GeV. The results come from data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 111 pb-1 collected by the High Resolution Spectrometer. Differences were observed in charged multiplicities, momentum distributions, and rapidity of the size expected from the different fragmentation functions and leading particle decay properties of the two samples. © 1985.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:19:49Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:7c26daed-a83c-48db-b08e-c252146e18dc
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:19:49Z
publishDate 1985
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:7c26daed-a83c-48db-b08e-c252146e18dc2022-03-26T20:55:17ZCOMPARISON OF LIGHT QUARK AND CHARM QUARK FRAGMENTATIONJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7c26daed-a83c-48db-b08e-c252146e18dcEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford1985Kesten, PAkerlof, CBonvicini, GChapman, JErrede, DHarnew, NMeyer, DNitz, DSeidl, AThun, RTrinko, TWillutzky, MDerrick, MKooijman, PLoos, JMusgrave, BPrice, LSchlereth, JSugano, KWeiss, JWood, DBaringer, PBlockus, DBrabson, BGray, SSeparate samples of charm quark and light quark (u, d, s) jets have been isolated in an experiment studying e+e- annihilations at s = 29 GeV. The results come from data corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 111 pb-1 collected by the High Resolution Spectrometer. Differences were observed in charged multiplicities, momentum distributions, and rapidity of the size expected from the different fragmentation functions and leading particle decay properties of the two samples. © 1985.
spellingShingle Kesten, P
Akerlof, C
Bonvicini, G
Chapman, J
Errede, D
Harnew, N
Meyer, D
Nitz, D
Seidl, A
Thun, R
Trinko, T
Willutzky, M
Derrick, M
Kooijman, P
Loos, J
Musgrave, B
Price, L
Schlereth, J
Sugano, K
Weiss, J
Wood, D
Baringer, P
Blockus, D
Brabson, B
Gray, S
COMPARISON OF LIGHT QUARK AND CHARM QUARK FRAGMENTATION
title COMPARISON OF LIGHT QUARK AND CHARM QUARK FRAGMENTATION
title_full COMPARISON OF LIGHT QUARK AND CHARM QUARK FRAGMENTATION
title_fullStr COMPARISON OF LIGHT QUARK AND CHARM QUARK FRAGMENTATION
title_full_unstemmed COMPARISON OF LIGHT QUARK AND CHARM QUARK FRAGMENTATION
title_short COMPARISON OF LIGHT QUARK AND CHARM QUARK FRAGMENTATION
title_sort comparison of light quark and charm quark fragmentation
work_keys_str_mv AT kestenp comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT akerlofc comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT bonvicinig comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT chapmanj comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT erreded comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT harnewn comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT meyerd comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT nitzd comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT seidla comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT thunr comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT trinkot comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT willutzkym comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT derrickm comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT kooijmanp comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT loosj comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT musgraveb comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT pricel comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT schlerethj comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT suganok comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT weissj comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT woodd comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT baringerp comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT blockusd comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT brabsonb comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation
AT grays comparisonoflightquarkandcharmquarkfragmentation