Effects of changes in diagnosis and registration on time trends in recorded childhood cancer incidence in Great Britain.

BACKGROUND: Increases in recorded childhood cancer incidence are widely reported, but do not necessarily represent real increases in risk. Time trends might conceal underlying steps caused by changes in diagnosis and registration procedures. METHODS: Using records from the National Registry of Child...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kroll, M, Carpenter, L, Murphy, M, Stiller, C
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2012
_version_ 1797077611973705728
author Kroll, M
Carpenter, L
Murphy, M
Stiller, C
author_facet Kroll, M
Carpenter, L
Murphy, M
Stiller, C
author_sort Kroll, M
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: Increases in recorded childhood cancer incidence are widely reported, but do not necessarily represent real increases in risk. Time trends might conceal underlying steps caused by changes in diagnosis and registration procedures. METHODS: Using records from the National Registry of Childhood Tumours 1966-2005 (N=54650), the age-sex-standardised rate for residents of Great Britain aged under 15 years was calculated by individual year of diagnosis for each cancer subtype, and the average annual percentage change (trend) was assessed. The timing of assumed step changes in rate was estimated by iterative Poisson regression, and compared graphically with the approximate timing of innovations previously identified from published sources. RESULTS: Estimated timing of underlying steps approximately coincided with the following relevant innovations: biochemical assays, mid-1980s (hepatic and germ-cell cancer); diagnostic imaging, mid-1980s to early 1990s (intracranial/intraspinal tumours, neuroblastoma, soft-tissue sarcoma); revised cancer registration scheme, 1971 (leukaemia, bone and soft-tissue sarcoma); mandatory registration, 1993 (intracranial/intraspinal tumours, retinoblastoma, melanoma/carcinoma); cancer registration improvements, 2001 (leukaemia, renal and hepatic cancer). CONCLUSION: While the possibility of some real change in risk cannot be excluded, for many cancer subtypes the estimated timing of underlying step changes in rate appeared to correspond with changes in diagnosis or registration procedures. Childhood cancer may have been considerably under-recorded in the past.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:20:36Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:7c6a6fc6-7168-43f6-9f42-18f6d6705e29
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:20:36Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:7c6a6fc6-7168-43f6-9f42-18f6d6705e292022-03-26T20:56:53ZEffects of changes in diagnosis and registration on time trends in recorded childhood cancer incidence in Great Britain.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7c6a6fc6-7168-43f6-9f42-18f6d6705e29EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Kroll, MCarpenter, LMurphy, MStiller, CBACKGROUND: Increases in recorded childhood cancer incidence are widely reported, but do not necessarily represent real increases in risk. Time trends might conceal underlying steps caused by changes in diagnosis and registration procedures. METHODS: Using records from the National Registry of Childhood Tumours 1966-2005 (N=54650), the age-sex-standardised rate for residents of Great Britain aged under 15 years was calculated by individual year of diagnosis for each cancer subtype, and the average annual percentage change (trend) was assessed. The timing of assumed step changes in rate was estimated by iterative Poisson regression, and compared graphically with the approximate timing of innovations previously identified from published sources. RESULTS: Estimated timing of underlying steps approximately coincided with the following relevant innovations: biochemical assays, mid-1980s (hepatic and germ-cell cancer); diagnostic imaging, mid-1980s to early 1990s (intracranial/intraspinal tumours, neuroblastoma, soft-tissue sarcoma); revised cancer registration scheme, 1971 (leukaemia, bone and soft-tissue sarcoma); mandatory registration, 1993 (intracranial/intraspinal tumours, retinoblastoma, melanoma/carcinoma); cancer registration improvements, 2001 (leukaemia, renal and hepatic cancer). CONCLUSION: While the possibility of some real change in risk cannot be excluded, for many cancer subtypes the estimated timing of underlying step changes in rate appeared to correspond with changes in diagnosis or registration procedures. Childhood cancer may have been considerably under-recorded in the past.
spellingShingle Kroll, M
Carpenter, L
Murphy, M
Stiller, C
Effects of changes in diagnosis and registration on time trends in recorded childhood cancer incidence in Great Britain.
title Effects of changes in diagnosis and registration on time trends in recorded childhood cancer incidence in Great Britain.
title_full Effects of changes in diagnosis and registration on time trends in recorded childhood cancer incidence in Great Britain.
title_fullStr Effects of changes in diagnosis and registration on time trends in recorded childhood cancer incidence in Great Britain.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of changes in diagnosis and registration on time trends in recorded childhood cancer incidence in Great Britain.
title_short Effects of changes in diagnosis and registration on time trends in recorded childhood cancer incidence in Great Britain.
title_sort effects of changes in diagnosis and registration on time trends in recorded childhood cancer incidence in great britain
work_keys_str_mv AT krollm effectsofchangesindiagnosisandregistrationontimetrendsinrecordedchildhoodcancerincidenceingreatbritain
AT carpenterl effectsofchangesindiagnosisandregistrationontimetrendsinrecordedchildhoodcancerincidenceingreatbritain
AT murphym effectsofchangesindiagnosisandregistrationontimetrendsinrecordedchildhoodcancerincidenceingreatbritain
AT stillerc effectsofchangesindiagnosisandregistrationontimetrendsinrecordedchildhoodcancerincidenceingreatbritain