Cohesion and polymorphism in solid rubidium chloride

The cohesive energetics of three phases of solid cubic rubidium chloride, the zinc blende structured 4:4 phase, the 6:6 sodium chloride polymorph and the 8:8 phase with the cesium chloride structure, are computed using a non-empirical fully ionic model. The rearrangement energies needed to convert f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pyper, N, Kirkland, A, Harding, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2006
_version_ 1797077958602522624
author Pyper, N
Kirkland, A
Harding, J
author_facet Pyper, N
Kirkland, A
Harding, J
author_sort Pyper, N
collection OXFORD
description The cohesive energetics of three phases of solid cubic rubidium chloride, the zinc blende structured 4:4 phase, the 6:6 sodium chloride polymorph and the 8:8 phase with the cesium chloride structure, are computed using a non-empirical fully ionic model. The rearrangement energies needed to convert free anions to their optimal states in-crystal, two-body inter-ionic potentials, plus the further contributions arising from electron correlation, are reported. The 'optimal' anion-anion potentials, computed by using at each geometry the optimal wavefunction, are compared with the 'frozen' potential using the same wavefunction at all geometries. The lattice energy of the 4:4 structure is predicted to be some 40 kJ mol -1 smaller than that of either the 6:6 or the 8:8 phases. Introduction of the Axilrod-Teller triple dipole dispersion interactions and the vibrational zero point energy predicts the 8:8 phase to lie 3.2 kJ mol -1 lower in energy than the 6:6 structure. This is both consistent with radius ratio arguments and supported by two separate experiments that strongly suggest that the 8:8 phase is favoured over the 6:6 structure at low temperatures even though the latter is more stable at ambient temperatures. A shell model description is presented for the ion-induced dipole interactions that arise both in small clusters and in crystals encapsulated in nanotubes. The elastic constants and entropy at 300 K predicted for the 6:6 phase from this model by using the GULP program agree well with experiment. A smaller entropy is predicted for the 8:8 structure. © 2006 IOP Publishing Ltd.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:25:31Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:7e012166-d004-4492-b667-013c7ea2cdd7
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:25:31Z
publishDate 2006
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:7e012166-d004-4492-b667-013c7ea2cdd72022-03-26T21:07:25ZCohesion and polymorphism in solid rubidium chlorideJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:7e012166-d004-4492-b667-013c7ea2cdd7EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2006Pyper, NKirkland, AHarding, JThe cohesive energetics of three phases of solid cubic rubidium chloride, the zinc blende structured 4:4 phase, the 6:6 sodium chloride polymorph and the 8:8 phase with the cesium chloride structure, are computed using a non-empirical fully ionic model. The rearrangement energies needed to convert free anions to their optimal states in-crystal, two-body inter-ionic potentials, plus the further contributions arising from electron correlation, are reported. The 'optimal' anion-anion potentials, computed by using at each geometry the optimal wavefunction, are compared with the 'frozen' potential using the same wavefunction at all geometries. The lattice energy of the 4:4 structure is predicted to be some 40 kJ mol -1 smaller than that of either the 6:6 or the 8:8 phases. Introduction of the Axilrod-Teller triple dipole dispersion interactions and the vibrational zero point energy predicts the 8:8 phase to lie 3.2 kJ mol -1 lower in energy than the 6:6 structure. This is both consistent with radius ratio arguments and supported by two separate experiments that strongly suggest that the 8:8 phase is favoured over the 6:6 structure at low temperatures even though the latter is more stable at ambient temperatures. A shell model description is presented for the ion-induced dipole interactions that arise both in small clusters and in crystals encapsulated in nanotubes. The elastic constants and entropy at 300 K predicted for the 6:6 phase from this model by using the GULP program agree well with experiment. A smaller entropy is predicted for the 8:8 structure. © 2006 IOP Publishing Ltd.
spellingShingle Pyper, N
Kirkland, A
Harding, J
Cohesion and polymorphism in solid rubidium chloride
title Cohesion and polymorphism in solid rubidium chloride
title_full Cohesion and polymorphism in solid rubidium chloride
title_fullStr Cohesion and polymorphism in solid rubidium chloride
title_full_unstemmed Cohesion and polymorphism in solid rubidium chloride
title_short Cohesion and polymorphism in solid rubidium chloride
title_sort cohesion and polymorphism in solid rubidium chloride
work_keys_str_mv AT pypern cohesionandpolymorphisminsolidrubidiumchloride
AT kirklanda cohesionandpolymorphisminsolidrubidiumchloride
AT hardingj cohesionandpolymorphisminsolidrubidiumchloride