How a single personal revelation might not be a source of knowledge
Many of those who come to a belief in the God of classical theism do so solely as a result of having had an experience which they believe it is reasonable for them to interpret as a revelation of His experience directly and graciously given to them by God Himself. I shall argue that - at least in th...
| Hovedforfatter: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Sprog: | English |
| Udgivet: |
Cambridge University Press
2003
|
| Fag: |
| _version_ | 1826281677726416896 |
|---|---|
| author | Mawson, T |
| author_facet | Mawson, T |
| author_sort | Mawson, T |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Many of those who come to a belief in the God of classical theism do so solely as a result of having had an experience which they believe it is reasonable for them to interpret as a revelation of His experience directly and graciously given to them by God Himself. I shall argue that - at least in the first instance - such people should probably not think of themselves as knowing that there is a God if they are also traditional libertarians and believe in Robert Nozick's theory of knowledge. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:32:24Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:8046f8cc-fd97-4820-872f-fa40fda507eb |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:32:24Z |
| publishDate | 2003 |
| publisher | Cambridge University Press |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:8046f8cc-fd97-4820-872f-fa40fda507eb2022-03-26T21:22:07ZHow a single personal revelation might not be a source of knowledgeJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8046f8cc-fd97-4820-872f-fa40fda507ebPhilosophyEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetCambridge University Press2003Mawson, TMany of those who come to a belief in the God of classical theism do so solely as a result of having had an experience which they believe it is reasonable for them to interpret as a revelation of His experience directly and graciously given to them by God Himself. I shall argue that - at least in the first instance - such people should probably not think of themselves as knowing that there is a God if they are also traditional libertarians and believe in Robert Nozick's theory of knowledge. |
| spellingShingle | Philosophy Mawson, T How a single personal revelation might not be a source of knowledge |
| title | How a single personal revelation might not be a source of knowledge |
| title_full | How a single personal revelation might not be a source of knowledge |
| title_fullStr | How a single personal revelation might not be a source of knowledge |
| title_full_unstemmed | How a single personal revelation might not be a source of knowledge |
| title_short | How a single personal revelation might not be a source of knowledge |
| title_sort | how a single personal revelation might not be a source of knowledge |
| topic | Philosophy |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mawsont howasinglepersonalrevelationmightnotbeasourceofknowledge |