Not more but different: a comment on the transitions research agenda

The sustainability transitions research network research agenda reflects the impressive growth and diversity of sustainability transitions scholarship, premised on an ethos of interdisciplinarity and openness to other research traditions and informed by increasingly diverse empirical case studies. N...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hopkins, D, Kester, J, Meelen, T, Schwanen, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2019
_version_ 1797078528844365824
author Hopkins, D
Kester, J
Meelen, T
Schwanen, T
author_facet Hopkins, D
Kester, J
Meelen, T
Schwanen, T
author_sort Hopkins, D
collection OXFORD
description The sustainability transitions research network research agenda reflects the impressive growth and diversity of sustainability transitions scholarship, premised on an ethos of interdisciplinarity and openness to other research traditions and informed by increasingly diverse empirical case studies. Nonetheless, an inclination to integrate concepts, ideas and logics from elsewhere into foundational core sustainability transitions research (STR) frameworks (e.g. Multi-Level Perspective, Technological Innovation Systems) can be observed. This potentially constrains the development of new concepts, ideas and logics within transition research. We therefore stress the importance of theoretical pluralism and in particular of starting the analysis of transition processes from within alternative frameworks and working through transition processes with those frameworks on their own terms. The risks and opportunities of more radical theoretical pluralism in STR are considered, and preliminary examples are presented from Foucauldian and post/decolonial traditions.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:33:10Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8083c6e2-558c-465e-bbf9-97acdb607204
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:33:10Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8083c6e2-558c-465e-bbf9-97acdb6072042022-03-26T21:23:53ZNot more but different: a comment on the transitions research agendaJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8083c6e2-558c-465e-bbf9-97acdb607204EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordElsevier2019Hopkins, DKester, JMeelen, TSchwanen, TThe sustainability transitions research network research agenda reflects the impressive growth and diversity of sustainability transitions scholarship, premised on an ethos of interdisciplinarity and openness to other research traditions and informed by increasingly diverse empirical case studies. Nonetheless, an inclination to integrate concepts, ideas and logics from elsewhere into foundational core sustainability transitions research (STR) frameworks (e.g. Multi-Level Perspective, Technological Innovation Systems) can be observed. This potentially constrains the development of new concepts, ideas and logics within transition research. We therefore stress the importance of theoretical pluralism and in particular of starting the analysis of transition processes from within alternative frameworks and working through transition processes with those frameworks on their own terms. The risks and opportunities of more radical theoretical pluralism in STR are considered, and preliminary examples are presented from Foucauldian and post/decolonial traditions.
spellingShingle Hopkins, D
Kester, J
Meelen, T
Schwanen, T
Not more but different: a comment on the transitions research agenda
title Not more but different: a comment on the transitions research agenda
title_full Not more but different: a comment on the transitions research agenda
title_fullStr Not more but different: a comment on the transitions research agenda
title_full_unstemmed Not more but different: a comment on the transitions research agenda
title_short Not more but different: a comment on the transitions research agenda
title_sort not more but different a comment on the transitions research agenda
work_keys_str_mv AT hopkinsd notmorebutdifferentacommentonthetransitionsresearchagenda
AT kesterj notmorebutdifferentacommentonthetransitionsresearchagenda
AT meelent notmorebutdifferentacommentonthetransitionsresearchagenda
AT schwanent notmorebutdifferentacommentonthetransitionsresearchagenda