Process tracing and the problem of missing data

Scholars who conduct process tracing often face the problem of missing data. The inability to document key steps in their causal chains makes it difficult to validate theoretical models. In this article, we conceptualize “missingness” as it relates to process tracing, describe different scenarios in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gonzalez Ocantos, E, Laporte, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2019
_version_ 1797078529883504640
author Gonzalez Ocantos, E
Laporte, J
author_facet Gonzalez Ocantos, E
Laporte, J
author_sort Gonzalez Ocantos, E
collection OXFORD
description Scholars who conduct process tracing often face the problem of missing data. The inability to document key steps in their causal chains makes it difficult to validate theoretical models. In this article, we conceptualize “missingness” as it relates to process tracing, describe different scenarios in which it is pervasive, and present three ways of addressing the problem. First, researchers should contextualize the data generation process. This requires characterizing the process whereby the actors that populate models decide whether to leave traces of their actions and motives. Researchers can thus assess whether or not incentives to produce missingness are compatible with the microfoundations of the theory, and consequently, whether or not missingness is disconfirmatory. Second, researchers may invest in indirect tests of causal mechanisms. Generating out-of-context data about microfoundations offers a plausible window into inaccessible mechanisms. Third, specifying the analytical status of steps in the causal chain allows scholars to make up for deficiencies in evidentiary support.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:33:11Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:808552b1-a44e-4a94-b9f3-0577aff715aa
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:33:11Z
publishDate 2019
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:808552b1-a44e-4a94-b9f3-0577aff715aa2022-03-26T21:23:53ZProcess tracing and the problem of missing dataJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:808552b1-a44e-4a94-b9f3-0577aff715aaEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordSAGE Publications2019Gonzalez Ocantos, ELaporte, JScholars who conduct process tracing often face the problem of missing data. The inability to document key steps in their causal chains makes it difficult to validate theoretical models. In this article, we conceptualize “missingness” as it relates to process tracing, describe different scenarios in which it is pervasive, and present three ways of addressing the problem. First, researchers should contextualize the data generation process. This requires characterizing the process whereby the actors that populate models decide whether to leave traces of their actions and motives. Researchers can thus assess whether or not incentives to produce missingness are compatible with the microfoundations of the theory, and consequently, whether or not missingness is disconfirmatory. Second, researchers may invest in indirect tests of causal mechanisms. Generating out-of-context data about microfoundations offers a plausible window into inaccessible mechanisms. Third, specifying the analytical status of steps in the causal chain allows scholars to make up for deficiencies in evidentiary support.
spellingShingle Gonzalez Ocantos, E
Laporte, J
Process tracing and the problem of missing data
title Process tracing and the problem of missing data
title_full Process tracing and the problem of missing data
title_fullStr Process tracing and the problem of missing data
title_full_unstemmed Process tracing and the problem of missing data
title_short Process tracing and the problem of missing data
title_sort process tracing and the problem of missing data
work_keys_str_mv AT gonzalezocantose processtracingandtheproblemofmissingdata
AT laportej processtracingandtheproblemofmissingdata