Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results Reply

Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results Reply

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Boutron, I, Ravaud, P, Altman, D
Format:	Journal article
Published:	2010

Similar Items

Reporting and interpretation of randomized controlled trials with statistically nonsignificant results for primary outcomes.
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2010)

Statistical Nonsignificance in Empirical Economics
by: Abadie, Alberto
Published: (2021)

Impact of Spin in the Abstracts of Articles Reporting Results of Randomized Controlled Trials in the Field of Cancer: The SPIIN Randomized Controlled Trial.
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2014)

In reply
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2010)

Comparison of registered and published primary outcomes in randomized controlled trials.
by: Mathieu, S, et al.
Published: (2009)

Impact of an online writing aid tool for writing a randomized trial report: the COBWEB (Consort-based WEB tool) randomized controlled trial.
by: Barnes, C, et al.
Published: (2015)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: Explanation and elaboration
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2009)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration.
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2008)

Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment; explanation and elaboration
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2009)

Deficiencies in the publication and reporting of the results of systematic reviews presented at scientific medical conferences
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2015)

CONSORT Statement for randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatments: a 2017 update and a CONSORT extension for nonpharmacologic trial abstracts
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2017)

Impact of adding a limitations section to abstracts of systematic reviews on readers’ interpretation: a randomized controlled trial
by: Yavchitz, A, et al.
Published: (2014)

Incorporation of assessments of risk of bias of primary studies in systematic reviews of randomised trials: a cross-sectional study
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2013)

Reporting the cost-effectiveness of interventions with nonsignificant effect differences: example from a trial of secondary prevention of coronary heart disease.
by: Johnston, K, et al.
Published: (2003)

Reviews assessing the quality or the reporting of randomized controlled trials are increasing over time but raised questions about how quality is assessed.
by: Dechartres, A, et al.
Published: (2011)

A protocol of a cross-sectional study evaluating an online tool for early career peer reviewers assessing reports of randomized controlled trials
by: Chauvin, A, et al.
Published: (2017)

Methods and processes of the CONSORT Group: example of an extension for trials assessing nonpharmacologic treatments.
by: Boutron, I, et al.
Published: (2008)

Reporting noninferiority trials--reply.
by: Pocock, S, et al.
Published: (2013)

Impact of a web-based tool (WebCONSORT) to improve the reporting of randomised trials: results of a randomised controlled trial
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2016)

From trial to practice Authors' reply
by: Glasziou, P, et al.
Published: (2010)

Reporting the clinical importance of randomized controlled trials.
by: Moher, D, et al.
Published: (2002)

Quantifying the magnitude of baseline covariate imbalances resulting from selection bias in randomized clinical trials - Comment
by: Altman, D
Published: (2005)

Ethical issues in the reporting of clinical trials - Reply
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2001)

Bayesian stopping rules for trials - Reply
by: Parmar, M, et al.
Published: (2002)

Reminding peer reviewers of reporting guideline items to improve completeness in published articles: primary results of 2 randomized trials
by: Speich, B, et al.
Published: (2023)

Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study
by: Dechartres, A, et al.
Published: (2017)

Real-world replication of randomized controlled trial results for carotid endarterectomy.
by: Feasby, T, et al.
Published: (2007)

Interferon-alpha: results from randomized trials.
by: Richards, S
Published: (1997)

The landscape and lexicon of blinding in randomized trials.
by: Schulz, K, et al.
Published: (2002)

Statistics notes: Analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements.
by: Vickers, A, et al.
Published: (2001)

Reporting characteristics of non-primary publications of results of randomized trials: a cross-sectional review.
by: Hopewell, S, et al.
Published: (2013)

Missing outcomes in randomized trials: Addressing the dilemma
by: Altman, D
Published: (2009)

Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
by: Speich, B, et al.
Published: (2020)

The economic impact of mobile phone ownership: Results from a randomized controlled trial in Tanzania
by: Roessler, P, et al.
Published: (2021)

PEP trial - Reply
by: Collins, R, et al.
Published: (2000)

Randomized controlled trial of interferon-beta-1a in secondary progressive MS - Clinical results
by: King, J, et al.
Published: (2001)

Association between analytic strategy and estimates of treatment outcomes in meta-analyses.
by: Dechartres, A, et al.
Published: (2014)

The impact of blinding on the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled multiple sclerosis clinical trial
by: Nosworthy, J, et al.
Published: (2001)

The impact of blinding on the results of a randomized, placebo-controlled multiple sclerosis clinical trial.
by: Noseworthy, J, et al.
Published: (1994)

The BALANCE trial reply
by: Geddes, J, et al.
Published: (2010)