Indirect comparison of interventions using published randomised trials: systematic review of PDE-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction
Background: There are no randomised and properly blinded trials directly comparing one PDE-5 inhibitor with another in a normal home setting. Valid indirect comparisons with a common comparator must examine equivalent doses, similar duration, similar populations, with the same outcomes reported in t...
Main Authors: | Moore, R, Derry, S, McQuay, H |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Subjects: |
Similar Items
-
Indirect comparison of interventions using published randomised trials: systematic review of PDE-5 inhibitors for erectile dysfunction
by: McQuay Henry J, et al.
Published: (2005-12-01) -
Faecal blood loss with aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors: systematic review of randomized trials using autologous chromium-labelled erythrocytes
by: Moore, R, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Discontinuation rates in clinical trials in musculoskeletal pain: meta-analysis from etoricoxib clinical trial reports
by: Moore, R, et al.
Published: (2008) -
Cyclo-oxygenase-2 selective inhibitors and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: balancing gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risk
by: Moore, R, et al.
Published: (2007) -
Minimum efficacy criteria for comparisons between treatments using individual patient meta-analysis of acute pain trials: examples of etoricoxib, paracetamol, ibuprofen/paracetamol combinations after third molar extraction
by: Moore, R, et al.
Published: (2011)