A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.

The purpose of this study was to examine whether there are advantages in terms of outcome assessment of using Rasch methods of scoring the 12-item Oxford Hip Score (OHS) questionnaire over conventionally Likert scores. As part of a prospective cohort study of total hip replacements in five former re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fitzpatrick, R, Norquist, J, Jenkinson, C, Reeves, B, Morris, R, Murray, D, Gregg, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2004
_version_ 1797078629227692032
author Fitzpatrick, R
Norquist, J
Jenkinson, C
Reeves, B
Morris, R
Murray, D
Gregg, P
author_facet Fitzpatrick, R
Norquist, J
Jenkinson, C
Reeves, B
Morris, R
Murray, D
Gregg, P
author_sort Fitzpatrick, R
collection OXFORD
description The purpose of this study was to examine whether there are advantages in terms of outcome assessment of using Rasch methods of scoring the 12-item Oxford Hip Score (OHS) questionnaire over conventionally Likert scores. As part of a prospective cohort study of total hip replacements in five former regions of England the OHS was sent to patients pre-operatively, at 3 months and 1 year post-operatively. Post-operative data was collected on over 5000 cases. Based on the level of satisfaction with surgery, patients were divided into satisfied and dissatisfied. Analyses were performed to test the relative precision (RP) of Rasch scoring vs. conventionally Likert scores in discriminating the groups experiencing different level of satisfaction. Considerable gains in precision were achieved with Rasch scoring methods when groups were compared 3 and 12 months post-operatively. The results from the current study suggest that in some situations there may be substantial gains in measuring health related outcomes using Rasch-based scoring methods.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:34:30Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:80edcb6b-8a3d-4201-92bb-5e679c45b4e0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:34:30Z
publishDate 2004
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:80edcb6b-8a3d-4201-92bb-5e679c45b4e02022-03-26T21:26:47ZA comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:80edcb6b-8a3d-4201-92bb-5e679c45b4e0EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2004Fitzpatrick, RNorquist, JJenkinson, CReeves, BMorris, RMurray, DGregg, PThe purpose of this study was to examine whether there are advantages in terms of outcome assessment of using Rasch methods of scoring the 12-item Oxford Hip Score (OHS) questionnaire over conventionally Likert scores. As part of a prospective cohort study of total hip replacements in five former regions of England the OHS was sent to patients pre-operatively, at 3 months and 1 year post-operatively. Post-operative data was collected on over 5000 cases. Based on the level of satisfaction with surgery, patients were divided into satisfied and dissatisfied. Analyses were performed to test the relative precision (RP) of Rasch scoring vs. conventionally Likert scores in discriminating the groups experiencing different level of satisfaction. Considerable gains in precision were achieved with Rasch scoring methods when groups were compared 3 and 12 months post-operatively. The results from the current study suggest that in some situations there may be substantial gains in measuring health related outcomes using Rasch-based scoring methods.
spellingShingle Fitzpatrick, R
Norquist, J
Jenkinson, C
Reeves, B
Morris, R
Murray, D
Gregg, P
A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.
title A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.
title_full A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.
title_fullStr A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.
title_short A comparison of Rasch with Likert scoring to discriminate between patients' evaluations of total hip replacement surgery.
title_sort comparison of rasch with likert scoring to discriminate between patients evaluations of total hip replacement surgery
work_keys_str_mv AT fitzpatrickr acomparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT norquistj acomparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT jenkinsonc acomparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT reevesb acomparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT morrisr acomparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT murrayd acomparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT greggp acomparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT fitzpatrickr comparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT norquistj comparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT jenkinsonc comparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT reevesb comparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT morrisr comparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT murrayd comparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery
AT greggp comparisonofraschwithlikertscoringtodiscriminatebetweenpatientsevaluationsoftotalhipreplacementsurgery