Does baseline fatigue influence treatment response to reboxetine or citalopram in depression? An open label randomized controlled trial.

It has been suggested that antidepressants that increase noradrenergic transmission should be better than serotonergic antidepressants at treating fatigue in depression. We conducted a secondary analysis of an RCT in which patients with depression were randomly assigned to reboxetine (a noradrenalin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bould, H, Wiles, N, Potokar, J, Cowen, P, Nutt, D, Peters, T, Lewis, G
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2012
_version_ 1797078662922633216
author Bould, H
Wiles, N
Potokar, J
Cowen, P
Nutt, D
Peters, T
Lewis, G
author_facet Bould, H
Wiles, N
Potokar, J
Cowen, P
Nutt, D
Peters, T
Lewis, G
author_sort Bould, H
collection OXFORD
description It has been suggested that antidepressants that increase noradrenergic transmission should be better than serotonergic antidepressants at treating fatigue in depression. We conducted a secondary analysis of an RCT in which patients with depression were randomly assigned to reboxetine (a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor [NARI]) or citalopram (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor [SSRI]). We investigated the difference between citalopram and reboxetine in treating the symptom of fatigue in depression, and also in treating depression with high levels of baseline fatigue. We found no difference between citalopram and reboxetine in terms of improvement in fatigue at six weeks (0.11, 95% confidence interval (-0.28, 0.49); p = 0.59:), or at 12 weeks. Using the Beck Depression Inventory at 12 weeks as the outcome measure, we found some evidence in support of our hypothesis that reboxetine is more effective than citalopram in treating depression in those with high baseline fatigue (interaction term: -2.87, 95% confidence interval (-5.15, -0.60); p = 0.01). We conclude that there is no evidence of any difference between reboxetine and citalopram in their efficacy in treating fatigue as a symptom of depression, but that reboxetine may be more effective in treating depression with high levels of fatigue. Fatigue might be useful in the prediction of response to NARIs or SSRIs.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:34:58Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:81159782-92ee-4a24-a9d6-161912c9e6eb
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:34:58Z
publishDate 2012
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:81159782-92ee-4a24-a9d6-161912c9e6eb2022-03-26T21:27:57ZDoes baseline fatigue influence treatment response to reboxetine or citalopram in depression? An open label randomized controlled trial.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:81159782-92ee-4a24-a9d6-161912c9e6ebEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2012Bould, HWiles, NPotokar, JCowen, PNutt, DPeters, TLewis, GIt has been suggested that antidepressants that increase noradrenergic transmission should be better than serotonergic antidepressants at treating fatigue in depression. We conducted a secondary analysis of an RCT in which patients with depression were randomly assigned to reboxetine (a noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor [NARI]) or citalopram (a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor [SSRI]). We investigated the difference between citalopram and reboxetine in treating the symptom of fatigue in depression, and also in treating depression with high levels of baseline fatigue. We found no difference between citalopram and reboxetine in terms of improvement in fatigue at six weeks (0.11, 95% confidence interval (-0.28, 0.49); p = 0.59:), or at 12 weeks. Using the Beck Depression Inventory at 12 weeks as the outcome measure, we found some evidence in support of our hypothesis that reboxetine is more effective than citalopram in treating depression in those with high baseline fatigue (interaction term: -2.87, 95% confidence interval (-5.15, -0.60); p = 0.01). We conclude that there is no evidence of any difference between reboxetine and citalopram in their efficacy in treating fatigue as a symptom of depression, but that reboxetine may be more effective in treating depression with high levels of fatigue. Fatigue might be useful in the prediction of response to NARIs or SSRIs.
spellingShingle Bould, H
Wiles, N
Potokar, J
Cowen, P
Nutt, D
Peters, T
Lewis, G
Does baseline fatigue influence treatment response to reboxetine or citalopram in depression? An open label randomized controlled trial.
title Does baseline fatigue influence treatment response to reboxetine or citalopram in depression? An open label randomized controlled trial.
title_full Does baseline fatigue influence treatment response to reboxetine or citalopram in depression? An open label randomized controlled trial.
title_fullStr Does baseline fatigue influence treatment response to reboxetine or citalopram in depression? An open label randomized controlled trial.
title_full_unstemmed Does baseline fatigue influence treatment response to reboxetine or citalopram in depression? An open label randomized controlled trial.
title_short Does baseline fatigue influence treatment response to reboxetine or citalopram in depression? An open label randomized controlled trial.
title_sort does baseline fatigue influence treatment response to reboxetine or citalopram in depression an open label randomized controlled trial
work_keys_str_mv AT bouldh doesbaselinefatigueinfluencetreatmentresponsetoreboxetineorcitalopramindepressionanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wilesn doesbaselinefatigueinfluencetreatmentresponsetoreboxetineorcitalopramindepressionanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT potokarj doesbaselinefatigueinfluencetreatmentresponsetoreboxetineorcitalopramindepressionanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cowenp doesbaselinefatigueinfluencetreatmentresponsetoreboxetineorcitalopramindepressionanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT nuttd doesbaselinefatigueinfluencetreatmentresponsetoreboxetineorcitalopramindepressionanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT peterst doesbaselinefatigueinfluencetreatmentresponsetoreboxetineorcitalopramindepressionanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lewisg doesbaselinefatigueinfluencetreatmentresponsetoreboxetineorcitalopramindepressionanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrial