Occupational asthma due to low molecular weight agents: eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic variants.

BACKGROUND: Despite having a work related deterioration in peak expiratory flow (PEF), many workers with occupational asthma show a low degree of within day diurnal variability atypical of non-occupational asthma. It was hypothesised that these workers would have a neutrophilic rather than an eosino...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anees, W, Huggins, V, Pavord, I, Robertson, A, Burge, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2002
_version_ 1797078761983705088
author Anees, W
Huggins, V
Pavord, I
Robertson, A
Burge, P
author_facet Anees, W
Huggins, V
Pavord, I
Robertson, A
Burge, P
author_sort Anees, W
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: Despite having a work related deterioration in peak expiratory flow (PEF), many workers with occupational asthma show a low degree of within day diurnal variability atypical of non-occupational asthma. It was hypothesised that these workers would have a neutrophilic rather than an eosinophilic airway inflammatory response. METHODS: Thirty eight consecutive workers with occupational asthma induced by low molecular weight agents underwent sputum induction and assessment of airway physiology while still exposed at work. RESULTS: Only 14 (36.8%) of the 38 workers had sputum eosinophilia (>2.2%). Both eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic groups had sputum neutrophilia (mean (SD) 59.5 (19.6)% and 55.1 (18.8)%, respectively). The diurnal variation and magnitude of fall in PEF during work periods was not significantly different between workers with and without sputum eosinophilia. Those with eosinophilia had a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1; 61.4% v 83% predicted, mean difference 21.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.2 to 34.1, p=0.001) and greater methacholine reactivity (geometric mean PD20 253 microg v 1401 microg, p=0.007). They also had greater bronchodilator reversibility (397 ml v 161 ml, mean difference 236, 95% CI of difference 84 to 389, p=0.003) which was unrelated to differences in baseline FEV(1). The presence of sputum eosinophilia did not relate to the causative agent, duration of exposure, atopy, or lack of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma caused by low molecular weight agents can be separated into eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic pathophysiological variants with the latter predominating. Both groups had evidence of sputum neutrophilia. Sputum eosinophilia was associated with more severe disease and greater bronchodilator reversibility but no difference in PEF response to work exposure.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:36:21Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:818b8374-7085-4217-8531-a08b393ed7e4
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:36:21Z
publishDate 2002
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:818b8374-7085-4217-8531-a08b393ed7e42022-03-26T21:30:55ZOccupational asthma due to low molecular weight agents: eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic variants.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:818b8374-7085-4217-8531-a08b393ed7e4EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2002Anees, WHuggins, VPavord, IRobertson, ABurge, PBACKGROUND: Despite having a work related deterioration in peak expiratory flow (PEF), many workers with occupational asthma show a low degree of within day diurnal variability atypical of non-occupational asthma. It was hypothesised that these workers would have a neutrophilic rather than an eosinophilic airway inflammatory response. METHODS: Thirty eight consecutive workers with occupational asthma induced by low molecular weight agents underwent sputum induction and assessment of airway physiology while still exposed at work. RESULTS: Only 14 (36.8%) of the 38 workers had sputum eosinophilia (>2.2%). Both eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic groups had sputum neutrophilia (mean (SD) 59.5 (19.6)% and 55.1 (18.8)%, respectively). The diurnal variation and magnitude of fall in PEF during work periods was not significantly different between workers with and without sputum eosinophilia. Those with eosinophilia had a lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1; 61.4% v 83% predicted, mean difference 21.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 9.2 to 34.1, p=0.001) and greater methacholine reactivity (geometric mean PD20 253 microg v 1401 microg, p=0.007). They also had greater bronchodilator reversibility (397 ml v 161 ml, mean difference 236, 95% CI of difference 84 to 389, p=0.003) which was unrelated to differences in baseline FEV(1). The presence of sputum eosinophilia did not relate to the causative agent, duration of exposure, atopy, or lack of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Asthma caused by low molecular weight agents can be separated into eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic pathophysiological variants with the latter predominating. Both groups had evidence of sputum neutrophilia. Sputum eosinophilia was associated with more severe disease and greater bronchodilator reversibility but no difference in PEF response to work exposure.
spellingShingle Anees, W
Huggins, V
Pavord, I
Robertson, A
Burge, P
Occupational asthma due to low molecular weight agents: eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic variants.
title Occupational asthma due to low molecular weight agents: eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic variants.
title_full Occupational asthma due to low molecular weight agents: eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic variants.
title_fullStr Occupational asthma due to low molecular weight agents: eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic variants.
title_full_unstemmed Occupational asthma due to low molecular weight agents: eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic variants.
title_short Occupational asthma due to low molecular weight agents: eosinophilic and non-eosinophilic variants.
title_sort occupational asthma due to low molecular weight agents eosinophilic and non eosinophilic variants
work_keys_str_mv AT aneesw occupationalasthmaduetolowmolecularweightagentseosinophilicandnoneosinophilicvariants
AT hugginsv occupationalasthmaduetolowmolecularweightagentseosinophilicandnoneosinophilicvariants
AT pavordi occupationalasthmaduetolowmolecularweightagentseosinophilicandnoneosinophilicvariants
AT robertsona occupationalasthmaduetolowmolecularweightagentseosinophilicandnoneosinophilicvariants
AT burgep occupationalasthmaduetolowmolecularweightagentseosinophilicandnoneosinophilicvariants