The Hopkins-Oxford Psychedelics Ethics (HOPE) working group consensus statement
Main Authors: | Jacobs, E, Earp, B, Appelbaum, P, Bruce, L, Cassidy, K, Celidwen, Y, Cheung, K, Clancy, S, Devenot, N, Evans, J, Fernandez Lynch, H, Friesen, P, Garcia Romeu, A, Gehani, N, Maloof, M, Marcus, O, Martin Moen, O, Mertens, M, Nayak, S, Noorani, T, Patch, K, Porsdam-Mann, S, Raj, G, Rajwani, K, Ray, K, Smith, W, Villiger, D, Levy, N, Crisp, R, Savulescu, J, Singh, I, Yaden, D |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
2024
|
Similar Items
-
Distinctive but not unique: the risks of psychedelic ethical exceptionalism
by: Cheung, K, et al.
Published: (2024) -
Psychedelics, meaningfulness, and the “proper scope” of medicine: continuing the conversation
by: Cheung, K, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Culture, context, and community in contemporary psychedelic research
by: Earp, BD, et al.
Published: (2021) -
Toward a broader psychedelic bioethics
by: Jacobs, E, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Psychedelic literary studies and the poetics of disruption
by: Neşe Devenot, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)