Medical crowdfunding, political marginalization, and government responsiveness: A reply to Larry Temkin

<p style="text-align:justify;"> Larry Temkin draws on the work of Angus Deaton to argue that countries with poor governance sometimes rely on charitable giving and foreign aid in ways that enable them to avoid relying on their own citizens; this can cause them to be unresponsive to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Liberman, A
Format: Journal article
Published: University of Oxford, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics 2019
_version_ 1797078827412750336
author Liberman, A
author_facet Liberman, A
author_sort Liberman, A
collection OXFORD
description <p style="text-align:justify;"> Larry Temkin draws on the work of Angus Deaton to argue that countries with poor governance sometimes rely on charitable giving and foreign aid in ways that enable them to avoid relying on their own citizens; this can cause them to be unresponsive to their citizens’ needs and thus prevent the long-term alleviation of poverty and other social problems. I argue that the implications of this “lack of government responsiveness argument” (or LOGRA) are both broader and narrower than they might first appear. I explore how LOGRA applies more broadly to certain types of charitable giving in developed countries, with a focus on medical crowdfunding. I then highlight how LOGRA does not apply to charitable giving aimed at alleviating the suffering of the absolutely politically marginalized, or those especially vulnerable people to whom governments are never responsive. </p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:37:05Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:81ca0e82-fd81-44f5-8cfd-37c4137108cd
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:37:05Z
publishDate 2019
publisher University of Oxford, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:81ca0e82-fd81-44f5-8cfd-37c4137108cd2022-03-26T21:32:39ZMedical crowdfunding, political marginalization, and government responsiveness: A reply to Larry TemkinJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:81ca0e82-fd81-44f5-8cfd-37c4137108cdSymplectic Elements at OxfordUniversity of Oxford, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics2019Liberman, A <p style="text-align:justify;"> Larry Temkin draws on the work of Angus Deaton to argue that countries with poor governance sometimes rely on charitable giving and foreign aid in ways that enable them to avoid relying on their own citizens; this can cause them to be unresponsive to their citizens’ needs and thus prevent the long-term alleviation of poverty and other social problems. I argue that the implications of this “lack of government responsiveness argument” (or LOGRA) are both broader and narrower than they might first appear. I explore how LOGRA applies more broadly to certain types of charitable giving in developed countries, with a focus on medical crowdfunding. I then highlight how LOGRA does not apply to charitable giving aimed at alleviating the suffering of the absolutely politically marginalized, or those especially vulnerable people to whom governments are never responsive. </p>
spellingShingle Liberman, A
Medical crowdfunding, political marginalization, and government responsiveness: A reply to Larry Temkin
title Medical crowdfunding, political marginalization, and government responsiveness: A reply to Larry Temkin
title_full Medical crowdfunding, political marginalization, and government responsiveness: A reply to Larry Temkin
title_fullStr Medical crowdfunding, political marginalization, and government responsiveness: A reply to Larry Temkin
title_full_unstemmed Medical crowdfunding, political marginalization, and government responsiveness: A reply to Larry Temkin
title_short Medical crowdfunding, political marginalization, and government responsiveness: A reply to Larry Temkin
title_sort medical crowdfunding political marginalization and government responsiveness a reply to larry temkin
work_keys_str_mv AT libermana medicalcrowdfundingpoliticalmarginalizationandgovernmentresponsivenessareplytolarrytemkin