Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley
In this response, we first tackle what we take to be the core disagreement between ourselves and Hammersley, namely the justification for our model of social research ethics governance. We then consider what follows from our defence of governance for ethics review and show how these claims attend to...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMJ Publishing
2018
|
| _version_ | 1797078830925479936 |
|---|---|
| author | Sheehan, M Dunn, M Sahan, K |
| author_facet | Sheehan, M Dunn, M Sahan, K |
| author_sort | Sheehan, M |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | In this response, we first tackle what we take to be the core disagreement between ourselves and Hammersley, namely the justification for our model of social research ethics governance. We then consider what follows from our defence of governance for ethics review and show how these claims attend to the specific concerns outlined by Hammersley. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:37:08Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:81cecdda-b9c0-4ca0-af0c-584603a8380b |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:37:08Z |
| publishDate | 2018 |
| publisher | BMJ Publishing |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:81cecdda-b9c0-4ca0-af0c-584603a8380b2022-03-26T21:32:49ZReasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to HammersleyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:81cecdda-b9c0-4ca0-af0c-584603a8380bEnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordBMJ Publishing2018Sheehan, MDunn, MSahan, KIn this response, we first tackle what we take to be the core disagreement between ourselves and Hammersley, namely the justification for our model of social research ethics governance. We then consider what follows from our defence of governance for ethics review and show how these claims attend to the specific concerns outlined by Hammersley. |
| spellingShingle | Sheehan, M Dunn, M Sahan, K Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley |
| title | Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley |
| title_full | Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley |
| title_fullStr | Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley |
| title_full_unstemmed | Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley |
| title_short | Reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre-emptive ethics governance in social research: a response to Hammersley |
| title_sort | reasonable disagreement and the justification of pre emptive ethics governance in social research a response to hammersley |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT sheehanm reasonabledisagreementandthejustificationofpreemptiveethicsgovernanceinsocialresearcharesponsetohammersley AT dunnm reasonabledisagreementandthejustificationofpreemptiveethicsgovernanceinsocialresearcharesponsetohammersley AT sahank reasonabledisagreementandthejustificationofpreemptiveethicsgovernanceinsocialresearcharesponsetohammersley |