Monotone rewritability and the analysis of queries, views, and rules

We study the interaction of views, queries, and background knowledge in the form of existential rules. The motivating questions concern monotonic determinacy of a query using views w.r.t. rules, which refers to the ability to recover the query answer from the views via a monotone function. We study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Benedikt, M, Kikot, S, Marti, J, Nawelaja-Ostropolski, P
Format: Conference item
Language:English
Published: IJCAI Organization 2024
_version_ 1826315348226342912
author Benedikt, M
Kikot, S
Marti, J
Nawelaja-Ostropolski, P
author_facet Benedikt, M
Kikot, S
Marti, J
Nawelaja-Ostropolski, P
author_sort Benedikt, M
collection OXFORD
description We study the interaction of views, queries, and background knowledge in the form of existential rules. The motivating questions concern monotonic determinacy of a query using views w.r.t. rules, which refers to the ability to recover the query answer from the views via a monotone function. We study the decidability of monotonic determinacy, and compare with variations that require the “recovery function” to be in a well-known monotone query language, such as conjunctive queries or Datalog. Surprisingly, we find that even in the presence of basic existential rules, the borderline between well-behaved and badly-behaved answerability differs radically from the unconstrained case. In order to understand this boundary, we require new results concerning entailment problems involving views and rules.
first_indexed 2024-09-25T04:19:00Z
format Conference item
id oxford-uuid:81d00039-4320-4875-a4ad-fd234a108f7e
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-09T03:24:51Z
publishDate 2024
publisher IJCAI Organization
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:81d00039-4320-4875-a4ad-fd234a108f7e2024-11-27T09:29:24ZMonotone rewritability and the analysis of queries, views, and rulesConference itemhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794uuid:81d00039-4320-4875-a4ad-fd234a108f7eEnglishSymplectic ElementsIJCAI Organization2024Benedikt, MKikot, SMarti, JNawelaja-Ostropolski, PWe study the interaction of views, queries, and background knowledge in the form of existential rules. The motivating questions concern monotonic determinacy of a query using views w.r.t. rules, which refers to the ability to recover the query answer from the views via a monotone function. We study the decidability of monotonic determinacy, and compare with variations that require the “recovery function” to be in a well-known monotone query language, such as conjunctive queries or Datalog. Surprisingly, we find that even in the presence of basic existential rules, the borderline between well-behaved and badly-behaved answerability differs radically from the unconstrained case. In order to understand this boundary, we require new results concerning entailment problems involving views and rules.
spellingShingle Benedikt, M
Kikot, S
Marti, J
Nawelaja-Ostropolski, P
Monotone rewritability and the analysis of queries, views, and rules
title Monotone rewritability and the analysis of queries, views, and rules
title_full Monotone rewritability and the analysis of queries, views, and rules
title_fullStr Monotone rewritability and the analysis of queries, views, and rules
title_full_unstemmed Monotone rewritability and the analysis of queries, views, and rules
title_short Monotone rewritability and the analysis of queries, views, and rules
title_sort monotone rewritability and the analysis of queries views and rules
work_keys_str_mv AT benediktm monotonerewritabilityandtheanalysisofqueriesviewsandrules
AT kikots monotonerewritabilityandtheanalysisofqueriesviewsandrules
AT martij monotonerewritabilityandtheanalysisofqueriesviewsandrules
AT nawelajaostropolskip monotonerewritabilityandtheanalysisofqueriesviewsandrules