Transplantation of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury: Friend or foe?

The gap between supply and demand in kidney transplantation has led to increased use of marginal kidneys; however, kidneys with acute kidney injury are often declined/discarded. To determine whether this policy is justified, we analyzed outcomes of donor kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) in a l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Boffa, C, van de Leemkolk, F, Curnow, E, Homan van der Heide, J, Gilbert, J, Sharples, E, Ploeg, R
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2016
_version_ 1826282065263329280
author Boffa, C
van de Leemkolk, F
Curnow, E
Homan van der Heide, J
Gilbert, J
Sharples, E
Ploeg, R
author_facet Boffa, C
van de Leemkolk, F
Curnow, E
Homan van der Heide, J
Gilbert, J
Sharples, E
Ploeg, R
author_sort Boffa, C
collection OXFORD
description The gap between supply and demand in kidney transplantation has led to increased use of marginal kidneys; however, kidneys with acute kidney injury are often declined/discarded. To determine whether this policy is justified, we analyzed outcomes of donor kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) in a large UK cohort. A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry evaluated deceased donors between 2003 and 2013. Donors were classified as no AKI, or AKI stage 1–3 according to Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria. Relationship of AKI with delayed graft function/primary nonfunction (DGF/PNF), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and graft‐survival at 90 days and 1 year was analyzed. There were 11 219 kidneys (1869 [17%] with AKI) included. Graft failure at 1 year is greater for donors with AKI than for those without (graft survival 89% vs. 91%, p = 0.02; odds ratio (OR) 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03–1.41]). DGF rates increase with donor AKI stage (p < 0.005), and PNF rates are significantly higher for AKIN stage 3 kidneys (9% vs. 4%, p = 0.04) Analysis of association between AKI and recipient eGFR suggests a risk of inferior eGFR with AKI versus no AKI (p < 0.005; OR 1.25 [95% CI: 1.08–1.31]). We report a small reduction in 1‐year graft‐survival of kidneys from donors with AKI. We conclude that AKI stage 1 or 2 kidneys should be used; however, caution is advised for AKI stage 3 donors.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:38:13Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8225e5e3-5785-49a4-be15-7260b0ac4b28
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:38:13Z
publishDate 2016
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8225e5e3-5785-49a4-be15-7260b0ac4b282022-03-26T21:35:18ZTransplantation of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury: Friend or foe?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8225e5e3-5785-49a4-be15-7260b0ac4b28EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2016Boffa, Cvan de Leemkolk, FCurnow, EHoman van der Heide, JGilbert, JSharples, EPloeg, RThe gap between supply and demand in kidney transplantation has led to increased use of marginal kidneys; however, kidneys with acute kidney injury are often declined/discarded. To determine whether this policy is justified, we analyzed outcomes of donor kidneys with acute kidney injury (AKI) in a large UK cohort. A retrospective analysis of the UK Transplant Registry evaluated deceased donors between 2003 and 2013. Donors were classified as no AKI, or AKI stage 1–3 according to Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) criteria. Relationship of AKI with delayed graft function/primary nonfunction (DGF/PNF), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and graft‐survival at 90 days and 1 year was analyzed. There were 11 219 kidneys (1869 [17%] with AKI) included. Graft failure at 1 year is greater for donors with AKI than for those without (graft survival 89% vs. 91%, p = 0.02; odds ratio (OR) 1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03–1.41]). DGF rates increase with donor AKI stage (p < 0.005), and PNF rates are significantly higher for AKIN stage 3 kidneys (9% vs. 4%, p = 0.04) Analysis of association between AKI and recipient eGFR suggests a risk of inferior eGFR with AKI versus no AKI (p < 0.005; OR 1.25 [95% CI: 1.08–1.31]). We report a small reduction in 1‐year graft‐survival of kidneys from donors with AKI. We conclude that AKI stage 1 or 2 kidneys should be used; however, caution is advised for AKI stage 3 donors.
spellingShingle Boffa, C
van de Leemkolk, F
Curnow, E
Homan van der Heide, J
Gilbert, J
Sharples, E
Ploeg, R
Transplantation of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury: Friend or foe?
title Transplantation of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury: Friend or foe?
title_full Transplantation of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury: Friend or foe?
title_fullStr Transplantation of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury: Friend or foe?
title_full_unstemmed Transplantation of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury: Friend or foe?
title_short Transplantation of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury: Friend or foe?
title_sort transplantation of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury friend or foe
work_keys_str_mv AT boffac transplantationofkidneysfromdonorswithacutekidneyinjuryfriendorfoe
AT vandeleemkolkf transplantationofkidneysfromdonorswithacutekidneyinjuryfriendorfoe
AT curnowe transplantationofkidneysfromdonorswithacutekidneyinjuryfriendorfoe
AT homanvanderheidej transplantationofkidneysfromdonorswithacutekidneyinjuryfriendorfoe
AT gilbertj transplantationofkidneysfromdonorswithacutekidneyinjuryfriendorfoe
AT sharplese transplantationofkidneysfromdonorswithacutekidneyinjuryfriendorfoe
AT ploegr transplantationofkidneysfromdonorswithacutekidneyinjuryfriendorfoe