Inadequate safety reporting in pre‐eclampsia trials: a systematic evaluation
<strong>Background</strong> Randomised trials and their syntheses in meta‐analyses offer a unique opportunity to assess the frequency and severity of adverse reactions. <strong>Objective</strong> To assess safety reporting in pre‐eclampsia trials. <strong>Search strat...
Main Authors: | Duffy, J, Hirsch, M, Pealing, L, Showell, M, Khan, K, Ziebland, S, McManus, r |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
Wiley
2017
|
Similar Items
-
Authors’ reply re: Inadequate safety reporting in pre‐eclampsia trials: a systematic evaluation
by: Duffy, J, et al.
Published: (2018) -
A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia
by: Duffy, J, et al.
Published: (2017) -
A systematic review of primary outcomes and outcome measure reporting in randomized trials evaluating treatments for pre-eclampsia
by: Duffy, J, et al.
Published: (2017) -
Outcome reporting across randomised controlled trials evaluating therapeutic interventions for pre-eclampsia: a systematic review
by: Duffy, J, et al.
Published: (2017) -
What outcomes should researchers select, collect, and report in pre-eclampsia research? A qualitative study exploring the views of women with lived experience of pre-eclampsia
by: Duffy, J, et al.
Published: (2019)