Flying solo: explaining single-party cabinets under minority presidentialism

In recent years, the comparative literature on presidential democracy has emphasized the role of coalitional politics in attenuating the ‘perils’ facing minority presidents. Yet since the beginning of the Third Wave of democratization in 1974, a surprising number of minority presidents have eschewed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chaisty, P, Power, T
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2018
_version_ 1797079066531069952
author Chaisty, P
Power, T
author_facet Chaisty, P
Power, T
author_sort Chaisty, P
collection OXFORD
description In recent years, the comparative literature on presidential democracy has emphasized the role of coalitional politics in attenuating the ‘perils’ facing minority presidents. Yet since the beginning of the Third Wave of democratization in 1974, a surprising number of minority presidents have eschewed cabinet coalitions (defined minimally as the awarding of at least one portfolio to a party other than the nominal party of the president). We observe unipartisan governments just under half of the time. What explains the adoption of single-party cabinets by minority presidents? We employ cross-sectional time-series analysis to address this question. We test hypotheses relating to the size and distribution of the formateur (presidential) and largest non-formateur parties that make up the legislature; the nature of party linkages and ideological distance between the president and possible partisan allies; and the extent of reactive veto powers held by the president.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:40:21Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:82d4b565-abb6-4f84-9795-d31206e0f800
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:40:21Z
publishDate 2018
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:82d4b565-abb6-4f84-9795-d31206e0f8002022-03-26T21:40:04ZFlying solo: explaining single-party cabinets under minority presidentialismJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:82d4b565-abb6-4f84-9795-d31206e0f800EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2018Chaisty, PPower, TIn recent years, the comparative literature on presidential democracy has emphasized the role of coalitional politics in attenuating the ‘perils’ facing minority presidents. Yet since the beginning of the Third Wave of democratization in 1974, a surprising number of minority presidents have eschewed cabinet coalitions (defined minimally as the awarding of at least one portfolio to a party other than the nominal party of the president). We observe unipartisan governments just under half of the time. What explains the adoption of single-party cabinets by minority presidents? We employ cross-sectional time-series analysis to address this question. We test hypotheses relating to the size and distribution of the formateur (presidential) and largest non-formateur parties that make up the legislature; the nature of party linkages and ideological distance between the president and possible partisan allies; and the extent of reactive veto powers held by the president.
spellingShingle Chaisty, P
Power, T
Flying solo: explaining single-party cabinets under minority presidentialism
title Flying solo: explaining single-party cabinets under minority presidentialism
title_full Flying solo: explaining single-party cabinets under minority presidentialism
title_fullStr Flying solo: explaining single-party cabinets under minority presidentialism
title_full_unstemmed Flying solo: explaining single-party cabinets under minority presidentialism
title_short Flying solo: explaining single-party cabinets under minority presidentialism
title_sort flying solo explaining single party cabinets under minority presidentialism
work_keys_str_mv AT chaistyp flyingsoloexplainingsinglepartycabinetsunderminoritypresidentialism
AT powert flyingsoloexplainingsinglepartycabinetsunderminoritypresidentialism