Air and surface sampling for monkeypox virus in a UK hospital: an observational study
<p><strong>Background</strong></p> An outbreak of monkeypox virus infections in non-endemic countries was recognised on May 12, 2022. As of September 29, more than 67 000 infections have been reported globally, with more than 3400 confirmed cases in the UK by September 26. Mo...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2022
|
| _version_ | 1826309294175289344 |
|---|---|
| author | Gould, S Atkinson, B Onianwa, O Spencer, A Furneaux, J Grieves, J Taylor, C Milligan, I Bennett, A Fletcher, T Dunning, J Price, N Beadsworth, M Schmid, M Emonts, M Tunbridge, A Porter, D Cohen, J Whittaker, E Sinha, R |
| author2 | NHS England Airborne High Consequence Infectious Diseases Network |
| author_facet | NHS England Airborne High Consequence Infectious Diseases Network Gould, S Atkinson, B Onianwa, O Spencer, A Furneaux, J Grieves, J Taylor, C Milligan, I Bennett, A Fletcher, T Dunning, J Price, N Beadsworth, M Schmid, M Emonts, M Tunbridge, A Porter, D Cohen, J Whittaker, E Sinha, R |
| author_sort | Gould, S |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | <p><strong>Background</strong></p>
An outbreak of monkeypox virus infections in non-endemic countries was recognised on May 12, 2022. As of September 29, more than 67 000 infections have been reported globally, with more than 3400 confirmed cases in the UK by September 26. Monkeypox virus is believed to be predominantly transmitted through direct contact with lesions or infected body fluids, with possible involvement of fomites and large respiratory droplets. A case of monkeypox in a health-care worker in the UK in 2018 was suspected to be due to virus exposure while changing bedding. We aimed to measure the extent of environmental contamination in the isolation rooms of patients with symptomatic monkeypox.
<p><strong>Methods</strong></p>
We investigated environmental contamination with monkeypox virus from infected patients admitted to isolation rooms at the Royal Free Hospital (London, UK) between May 24 and June 17, 2022. Surface swabs of high-touch areas in five isolation rooms, of the personal protective equipment (PPE) of health-care workers in doffing areas in three rooms, and from air samples collected before and during bedding changes in five rooms were analysed using quantitative PCR to assess monkeypox virus contamination levels. Virus isolation was performed to confirm presence of infectious virus in selected positive samples.
<p><strong>Findings</strong></p>
We identified widespread surface contamination (56 [93%] of 60 samples were positive) in occupied patient rooms (monkeypox DNA cycle threshold [Ct] values 24·7–37·4), on health-care worker PPE after use (Ct 26·1–35·6), and in PPE doffing areas (Ct 26·3–36·8). Of 20 air samples taken, five (25%) were positive. Three (75%) of four air samples collected before and during a bedding change in one patient's room were positive (Ct 32·7–36·2). Replication-competent virus was identified in two (50%) of four samples selected for viral isolation, including from air samples collected during bedding change.
<p><strong>Interpretation</strong></p>
These data show contamination in isolation facilities and potential for suspension of monkeypox virus into the air during specific activities. PPE contamination was observed after clinical contact and changing of bedding. Contamination of hard surfaces in doffing areas supports the importance of cleaning protocols, PPE use, and doffing procedures.
<p><strong>Funding</strong></p>
None. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:32:05Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:833613a5-3566-4e58-b822-0ccfb1f52438 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T07:32:05Z |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:833613a5-3566-4e58-b822-0ccfb1f524382023-02-06T14:51:49ZAir and surface sampling for monkeypox virus in a UK hospital: an observational studyJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:833613a5-3566-4e58-b822-0ccfb1f52438EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2022Gould, SAtkinson, BOnianwa, OSpencer, AFurneaux, JGrieves, JTaylor, CMilligan, IBennett, AFletcher, TDunning, JPrice, NBeadsworth, MSchmid, MEmonts, MTunbridge, APorter, DCohen, JWhittaker, ESinha, RNHS England Airborne High Consequence Infectious Diseases Network<p><strong>Background</strong></p> An outbreak of monkeypox virus infections in non-endemic countries was recognised on May 12, 2022. As of September 29, more than 67 000 infections have been reported globally, with more than 3400 confirmed cases in the UK by September 26. Monkeypox virus is believed to be predominantly transmitted through direct contact with lesions or infected body fluids, with possible involvement of fomites and large respiratory droplets. A case of monkeypox in a health-care worker in the UK in 2018 was suspected to be due to virus exposure while changing bedding. We aimed to measure the extent of environmental contamination in the isolation rooms of patients with symptomatic monkeypox. <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> We investigated environmental contamination with monkeypox virus from infected patients admitted to isolation rooms at the Royal Free Hospital (London, UK) between May 24 and June 17, 2022. Surface swabs of high-touch areas in five isolation rooms, of the personal protective equipment (PPE) of health-care workers in doffing areas in three rooms, and from air samples collected before and during bedding changes in five rooms were analysed using quantitative PCR to assess monkeypox virus contamination levels. Virus isolation was performed to confirm presence of infectious virus in selected positive samples. <p><strong>Findings</strong></p> We identified widespread surface contamination (56 [93%] of 60 samples were positive) in occupied patient rooms (monkeypox DNA cycle threshold [Ct] values 24·7–37·4), on health-care worker PPE after use (Ct 26·1–35·6), and in PPE doffing areas (Ct 26·3–36·8). Of 20 air samples taken, five (25%) were positive. Three (75%) of four air samples collected before and during a bedding change in one patient's room were positive (Ct 32·7–36·2). Replication-competent virus was identified in two (50%) of four samples selected for viral isolation, including from air samples collected during bedding change. <p><strong>Interpretation</strong></p> These data show contamination in isolation facilities and potential for suspension of monkeypox virus into the air during specific activities. PPE contamination was observed after clinical contact and changing of bedding. Contamination of hard surfaces in doffing areas supports the importance of cleaning protocols, PPE use, and doffing procedures. <p><strong>Funding</strong></p> None. |
| spellingShingle | Gould, S Atkinson, B Onianwa, O Spencer, A Furneaux, J Grieves, J Taylor, C Milligan, I Bennett, A Fletcher, T Dunning, J Price, N Beadsworth, M Schmid, M Emonts, M Tunbridge, A Porter, D Cohen, J Whittaker, E Sinha, R Air and surface sampling for monkeypox virus in a UK hospital: an observational study |
| title | Air and surface sampling for monkeypox virus in a UK hospital: an observational study |
| title_full | Air and surface sampling for monkeypox virus in a UK hospital: an observational study |
| title_fullStr | Air and surface sampling for monkeypox virus in a UK hospital: an observational study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Air and surface sampling for monkeypox virus in a UK hospital: an observational study |
| title_short | Air and surface sampling for monkeypox virus in a UK hospital: an observational study |
| title_sort | air and surface sampling for monkeypox virus in a uk hospital an observational study |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT goulds airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT atkinsonb airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT onianwao airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT spencera airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT furneauxj airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT grievesj airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT taylorc airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT milligani airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT bennetta airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT fletchert airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT dunningj airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT pricen airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT beadsworthm airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT schmidm airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT emontsm airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT tunbridgea airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT porterd airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT cohenj airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT whittakere airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy AT sinhar airandsurfacesamplingformonkeypoxvirusinaukhospitalanobservationalstudy |