Editors’ response to concerns over the publication of the Cochrane HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias

Editors’ response to concerns over the publication of the Cochrane HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Heneghan, C, Onakpoya, I
Format:	Journal article
Language:	English
Published:	BMJ Publishing Group 2018

Similar Items

Upper bound estimate of incomplete Cochrane sum
by: Ma Yuankui, et al.
Published: (2017-06-01)

Efficacy and safety of prophylactic HPV vaccines. A Cochrane review of randomized trials
by: M. Arbyn, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Editors’ note on nonavalent HPV vaccine (HPV)
by: Mauro Romero Leal Passos, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration.
by: Turner, L, et al.
Published: (2013)

Beyond quantified ignorance: rebuilding rationality without the bias bias
by: Henry Brighton
Published: (2019-03-01)

Addressing Men’s Health Needs in Nepal: An Ignored Public and Clinical Health Concern
by: Mahesh Chandra Puri, et al.
Published: (2022-11-01)

Physical activity interventions and chronic diseases: A matched-pair analysis comparing Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
by: Hacke, C, et al.
Published: (2017)

Methodological Bias Can Lead the Cochrane Collaboration to Irrelevance in Public Health Decision-Making.
by: Antonio Montresor, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01)

The test characteristics of a biased or ignorant diagnostician
by: Amnon Sonnenberg
Published: (2022-08-01)

Risk of bias judgments for random sequence generation in Cochrane systematic reviews were frequently not in line with Cochrane Handbook
by: Ognjen Barcot, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

Letter to the editor: female sex workers and HPV vaccine
by: Maarten F. Schim van der Loeff, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Letter to the editor: female sex workers and HPV vaccine
by: Brandon Brown, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
by: Higgins, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
by: Higgins, J, et al.
Published: (2011)

Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies
by: Gøtzsche Peter C, et al.
Published: (2008-04-01)

The Cochrane Collaboration and the Cochrane Library.
by: Clarke, M
Published: (2007)

Commentary: Ignorance as Bias: Radiolab, Yellow Rain, and “The Fact of the Matter”
by: Paul Hillmer, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01)

Cochrane corner: self-monitoring and self-management of oral anticoagulation.
by: Heneghan, C, et al.
Published: (2017)

Failing to ignore the ignorant: Mistaking ignorance for error
by: André Vaz, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

Failing to ignore the ignorant: Mistaking ignorance for error
by: André Vaz, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

The judgement of biases included in the category “other bias” in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: a systematic survey
by: Andrija Babic, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

The Knowledge and Attitudes of University Students concerning HPV Vaccine and Cervical Screening
by: L Elit, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
by: Maximilian Siebert, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Outcome reporting bias in Cochrane systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis
by: Jamie Kirkham, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Behind the veil of ignorance: Self-serving bias in climate change negotiations
by: Peter H. Kriss, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01)

Behind the veil of ignorance: Self-serving bias in climate change negotiations
by: Peter H. Kriss, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01)

Why is the nonavalent HPV vaccine so important for Brazil?
by: Edison Natal Fedrizzi
Published: (2022-01-01)

Cochrane corner: vitamin K for improved anticoagulation control in patients receiving warfarin
by: Mahtani, K, et al.
Published: (2015)

Lay health worker attrition: important but often ignored
by: Lungiswa Nkonki, et al.

MRS Shimming: An Important Point Which Should not be Ignored
by: B Zeinali-Rafsanjani, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01)

The effect of the CONSORT statement on the amount of "unclear" Risk of Bias reporting in Cochrane Systematic Reviews.
by: Maaike M Rademaker, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Advocacy for large-scale food fortification ignores pertinent evidence and safety concerns
by: Anura V Kurpad, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Ignoring non‐English‐language studies may bias ecological meta‐analyses
by: Ko Konno, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

Medicalizing distress, ignoring public health strategies
by: P Thangadurai, et al.
Published: (2014-01-01)

National HPV Vaccination Program in Poland—Public Awareness, Sources of Knowledge, and Willingness to Vaccinate Children against HPV
by: Mateusz Jankowski, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Analysis of the Cochrane Review: Influenza Vaccines for Preventing Cardiovascular Disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;5:CD005050.
by: Daniel Caldeira, et al.
Published: (2015-07-01)

The Cochrane Collaboration.
by: Scholten, R, et al.
Published: (2005)

Cochrane highlights
by: Rachel Riera, et al.

A place of considerable importance: Lord Cochrane and the siege of Roses 1808
by: Reay, J
Published: (2009)

mRNA Vaccines: Why Is the Biology of Retroposition Ignored?
by: Tomislav Domazet-Lošo
Published: (2022-04-01)