Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy.

The main objective of this study was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of five alternative diagnostic strategies for identification of severe carotid stenosis in recently symptomatic patients. A decision-analytical model with Markov transition states was constructed. Data sources included a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: U-King-Im, J, Hollingworth, W, Trivedi, R, Cross, J, Higgins, N, Graves, M, Gutnikov, S, Kirkpatrick, P, Warburton, E, Antoun, N, Rothwell, P, Gillard, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2005
_version_ 1797079332320968704
author U-King-Im, J
Hollingworth, W
Trivedi, R
Cross, J
Higgins, N
Graves, M
Gutnikov, S
Kirkpatrick, P
Warburton, E
Antoun, N
Rothwell, P
Gillard, J
author_facet U-King-Im, J
Hollingworth, W
Trivedi, R
Cross, J
Higgins, N
Graves, M
Gutnikov, S
Kirkpatrick, P
Warburton, E
Antoun, N
Rothwell, P
Gillard, J
author_sort U-King-Im, J
collection OXFORD
description The main objective of this study was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of five alternative diagnostic strategies for identification of severe carotid stenosis in recently symptomatic patients. A decision-analytical model with Markov transition states was constructed. Data sources included a prospective study involving 167 patients who had screening Doppler ultrasound (DUS), confirmatory contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) and confirmatory digital subtraction angiography (DSA), individual patient data from the European Carotid Surgery Trial and other published clinical and cost data. A "selective" strategy, whereby all patients receive DUS and CEMRA (only proceeding to DSA if the CEMRA is positive and the DUS is negative), was most cost-effective. This was both the cheapest imaging and treatment strategy (35,205 dollars per patient) and yielded 6.1590 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), higher than three alternative imaging strategies. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that there was less than a 10% probability that imaging with either DUS or DSA alone are cost-effective at the conventional 50,000 dollars/QALY threshold. In conclusion, DSA is not cost-effective in the routine diagnostic workup of most patients. DUS, with additional imaging in the form of CEMRA, is recommended, with a strategy of "CEMRA and selective DUS review" being shown to be the optimal imaging strategy.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:44:20Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:84197359-5727-4d41-9ba2-4a2bada9f413
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:44:20Z
publishDate 2005
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:84197359-5727-4d41-9ba2-4a2bada9f4132022-03-26T21:48:52ZCost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:84197359-5727-4d41-9ba2-4a2bada9f413EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2005U-King-Im, JHollingworth, WTrivedi, RCross, JHiggins, NGraves, MGutnikov, SKirkpatrick, PWarburton, EAntoun, NRothwell, PGillard, JThe main objective of this study was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of five alternative diagnostic strategies for identification of severe carotid stenosis in recently symptomatic patients. A decision-analytical model with Markov transition states was constructed. Data sources included a prospective study involving 167 patients who had screening Doppler ultrasound (DUS), confirmatory contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CEMRA) and confirmatory digital subtraction angiography (DSA), individual patient data from the European Carotid Surgery Trial and other published clinical and cost data. A "selective" strategy, whereby all patients receive DUS and CEMRA (only proceeding to DSA if the CEMRA is positive and the DUS is negative), was most cost-effective. This was both the cheapest imaging and treatment strategy (35,205 dollars per patient) and yielded 6.1590 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), higher than three alternative imaging strategies. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that there was less than a 10% probability that imaging with either DUS or DSA alone are cost-effective at the conventional 50,000 dollars/QALY threshold. In conclusion, DSA is not cost-effective in the routine diagnostic workup of most patients. DUS, with additional imaging in the form of CEMRA, is recommended, with a strategy of "CEMRA and selective DUS review" being shown to be the optimal imaging strategy.
spellingShingle U-King-Im, J
Hollingworth, W
Trivedi, R
Cross, J
Higgins, N
Graves, M
Gutnikov, S
Kirkpatrick, P
Warburton, E
Antoun, N
Rothwell, P
Gillard, J
Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy.
title Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy.
title_full Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy.
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy.
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy.
title_short Cost-effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy.
title_sort cost effectiveness of diagnostic strategies prior to carotid endarterectomy
work_keys_str_mv AT ukingimj costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy
AT hollingworthw costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy
AT trivedir costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy
AT crossj costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy
AT higginsn costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy
AT gravesm costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy
AT gutnikovs costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy
AT kirkpatrickp costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy
AT warburtone costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy
AT antounn costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy
AT rothwellp costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy
AT gillardj costeffectivenessofdiagnosticstrategiespriortocarotidendarterectomy