Best buys and own brands: Investment platforms’ recommendations of mutual funds

Individuals increasingly buy mutual funds via online platforms, whose “best-buy” recommendations heavily influence flows. As intermediaries of mutual funds, platforms provide none of the unobservable interaction or intangible benefits of brokers, and so allow clean tests of the determinants, influen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cookson, G, Jenkinson, T, Jones, H, Martinez, JV
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2020
_version_ 1797106817430454272
author Cookson, G
Jenkinson, T
Jones, H
Martinez, JV
author_facet Cookson, G
Jenkinson, T
Jones, H
Martinez, JV
author_sort Cookson, G
collection OXFORD
description Individuals increasingly buy mutual funds via online platforms, whose “best-buy” recommendations heavily influence flows. As intermediaries of mutual funds, platforms provide none of the unobservable interaction or intangible benefits of brokers, and so allow clean tests of the determinants, influence, and value of their fund recommendations. Using unique U.K. data, we find that platforms favor “own-brand” funds and those paying them a higher commission share. Investors discount own-brand recommendations, but not those paying high commission shares (which were not observable in the United Kingdom). A regulatory ban on commission sharing lowered costs and improved the informativeness of platform recommendations.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:07:52Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:84450809-3da8-4c6a-bfc1-0f41ac780b71
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:07:52Z
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:84450809-3da8-4c6a-bfc1-0f41ac780b712022-05-20T09:33:50ZBest buys and own brands: Investment platforms’ recommendations of mutual fundsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:84450809-3da8-4c6a-bfc1-0f41ac780b71EnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2020Cookson, GJenkinson, TJones, HMartinez, JVIndividuals increasingly buy mutual funds via online platforms, whose “best-buy” recommendations heavily influence flows. As intermediaries of mutual funds, platforms provide none of the unobservable interaction or intangible benefits of brokers, and so allow clean tests of the determinants, influence, and value of their fund recommendations. Using unique U.K. data, we find that platforms favor “own-brand” funds and those paying them a higher commission share. Investors discount own-brand recommendations, but not those paying high commission shares (which were not observable in the United Kingdom). A regulatory ban on commission sharing lowered costs and improved the informativeness of platform recommendations.
spellingShingle Cookson, G
Jenkinson, T
Jones, H
Martinez, JV
Best buys and own brands: Investment platforms’ recommendations of mutual funds
title Best buys and own brands: Investment platforms’ recommendations of mutual funds
title_full Best buys and own brands: Investment platforms’ recommendations of mutual funds
title_fullStr Best buys and own brands: Investment platforms’ recommendations of mutual funds
title_full_unstemmed Best buys and own brands: Investment platforms’ recommendations of mutual funds
title_short Best buys and own brands: Investment platforms’ recommendations of mutual funds
title_sort best buys and own brands investment platforms recommendations of mutual funds
work_keys_str_mv AT cooksong bestbuysandownbrandsinvestmentplatformsrecommendationsofmutualfunds
AT jenkinsont bestbuysandownbrandsinvestmentplatformsrecommendationsofmutualfunds
AT jonesh bestbuysandownbrandsinvestmentplatformsrecommendationsofmutualfunds
AT martinezjv bestbuysandownbrandsinvestmentplatformsrecommendationsofmutualfunds