Factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in Oxfordshire

<p><strong>Aims</strong></p> <p>To investigate variables at the demographic and primary care practice levels that influence the uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>Data were extracted from...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Moreton, R, Stratton, I, Chave, S, Lipinski, H, Scanlon, P
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2017
_version_ 1797079384221286400
author Moreton, R
Stratton, I
Chave, S
Lipinski, H
Scanlon, P
author_facet Moreton, R
Stratton, I
Chave, S
Lipinski, H
Scanlon, P
author_sort Moreton, R
collection OXFORD
description <p><strong>Aims</strong></p> <p>To investigate variables at the demographic and primary care practice levels that influence the uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>Data were extracted from the management software of one screening programme for 21 797 people registered with 79 general practices. Uptake was examined by gender, age group, modality of screening (mobile unit at general practice versus high‐street optometrist), and by general practice. A telephone survey of high‐street optometrists provided information on the availability of screening appointments.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong></p> <p>Uptake was 82.4% during the study period, and was higher for men (83.2%) than for women (81.5%) (P = 0.001). Uptake varied by age group (P &lt; 0.001), being lowest in those aged 12–39 years (67%). Uptake was higher for people invited to a general practice for screening by a mobile unit (83.5%) than for those invited for screening by a high‐street optometrist (82%) (P = 0.006). After adjusting for these factors and for socio‐economic deprivation score at the location of the general practice, heterogeneity in uptake rate was still observed between some practices. Our survey of optometrists indicated wide variation in the availability of time slots for screening during the week and of screening appointment provision.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p> <p>Diabetic retinopathy screening services do not achieve high uptake among the youngest or oldest age groups. Practices in the least deprived areas had the highest uptake. Variation in uptake between general practices after adjustment for individual‐level variables and deprivation suggests that practice‐level factors may have an important role in determining rates of screening attendance.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:45:07Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:845e6ed1-0292-4b03-84ca-35d867070e39
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:45:07Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:845e6ed1-0292-4b03-84ca-35d867070e392022-03-26T21:50:38ZFactors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in OxfordshireJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:845e6ed1-0292-4b03-84ca-35d867070e39EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordWiley2017Moreton, RStratton, IChave, SLipinski, HScanlon, P<p><strong>Aims</strong></p> <p>To investigate variables at the demographic and primary care practice levels that influence the uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening.</p> <p><strong>Methods</strong></p> <p>Data were extracted from the management software of one screening programme for 21 797 people registered with 79 general practices. Uptake was examined by gender, age group, modality of screening (mobile unit at general practice versus high‐street optometrist), and by general practice. A telephone survey of high‐street optometrists provided information on the availability of screening appointments.</p> <p><strong>Results</strong></p> <p>Uptake was 82.4% during the study period, and was higher for men (83.2%) than for women (81.5%) (P = 0.001). Uptake varied by age group (P &lt; 0.001), being lowest in those aged 12–39 years (67%). Uptake was higher for people invited to a general practice for screening by a mobile unit (83.5%) than for those invited for screening by a high‐street optometrist (82%) (P = 0.006). After adjusting for these factors and for socio‐economic deprivation score at the location of the general practice, heterogeneity in uptake rate was still observed between some practices. Our survey of optometrists indicated wide variation in the availability of time slots for screening during the week and of screening appointment provision.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions</strong></p> <p>Diabetic retinopathy screening services do not achieve high uptake among the youngest or oldest age groups. Practices in the least deprived areas had the highest uptake. Variation in uptake between general practices after adjustment for individual‐level variables and deprivation suggests that practice‐level factors may have an important role in determining rates of screening attendance.</p>
spellingShingle Moreton, R
Stratton, I
Chave, S
Lipinski, H
Scanlon, P
Factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in Oxfordshire
title Factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in Oxfordshire
title_full Factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in Oxfordshire
title_fullStr Factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in Oxfordshire
title_full_unstemmed Factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in Oxfordshire
title_short Factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in Oxfordshire
title_sort factors determining uptake of diabetic retinopathy screening in oxfordshire
work_keys_str_mv AT moretonr factorsdetermininguptakeofdiabeticretinopathyscreeninginoxfordshire
AT strattoni factorsdetermininguptakeofdiabeticretinopathyscreeninginoxfordshire
AT chaves factorsdetermininguptakeofdiabeticretinopathyscreeninginoxfordshire
AT lipinskih factorsdetermininguptakeofdiabeticretinopathyscreeninginoxfordshire
AT scanlonp factorsdetermininguptakeofdiabeticretinopathyscreeninginoxfordshire