Exploring patients' views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: In a pan-European randomised controlled trial (GRACE INTRO) of two interventions, (i) a point-of-care C-reactive protein test and/or (ii) training in communication skills and use of an interactive patient booklet, both interventions resulted in large reductions in antibiotic prescribing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tonkin-Crine, S, Anthierens, S, Francis, N, Brugman, C, Fernandez-Vandellos, P, Krawczyk, J, Llor, C, Yardley, L, Coenen, S, Godycki-Cwirko, M, Butler, C, Verheij, T, Goossens, H, Little, P, Cals, J
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2014
_version_ 1826282574009335808
author Tonkin-Crine, S
Anthierens, S
Francis, N
Brugman, C
Fernandez-Vandellos, P
Krawczyk, J
Llor, C
Yardley, L
Coenen, S
Godycki-Cwirko, M
Butler, C
Verheij, T
Goossens, H
Little, P
Cals, J
author_facet Tonkin-Crine, S
Anthierens, S
Francis, N
Brugman, C
Fernandez-Vandellos, P
Krawczyk, J
Llor, C
Yardley, L
Coenen, S
Godycki-Cwirko, M
Butler, C
Verheij, T
Goossens, H
Little, P
Cals, J
author_sort Tonkin-Crine, S
collection OXFORD
description BACKGROUND: In a pan-European randomised controlled trial (GRACE INTRO) of two interventions, (i) a point-of-care C-reactive protein test and/or (ii) training in communication skills and use of an interactive patient booklet, both interventions resulted in large reductions in antibiotic prescribing for acute cough. AIMS: This process evaluation explored patients' views of primary care consultations using the two interventions in six European countries. METHODS: Sixty-two interviews were conducted with patients who had participated in the GRACE INTRO trial. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and translated into English where necessary. Analysis used techniques from thematic and framework analysis. RESULTS: Most patients were satisfied with their consultation despite many not receiving an antibiotic. Patients appeared to accept the use of both intervention approaches. A minority, but particularly in the trial arm with both interventions, reported that they would wait longer before consulting for cough in future. CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceived that both interventions supported the general practitioner's (GP's) prescribing decisions by helping them understand when an antibiotic was, and was not, needed. Patients consulting with acute cough had largely positive views about the GP's enhanced communication skills, which included understanding their concerns, and the use of a near-patient test as an additional investigation.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:45:54Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:84a68b7b-3283-42e1-8950-d1824a678d16
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:45:54Z
publishDate 2014
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:84a68b7b-3283-42e1-8950-d1824a678d162022-03-26T21:52:25ZExploring patients' views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study.Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:84a68b7b-3283-42e1-8950-d1824a678d16EnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2014Tonkin-Crine, SAnthierens, SFrancis, NBrugman, CFernandez-Vandellos, PKrawczyk, JLlor, CYardley, LCoenen, SGodycki-Cwirko, MButler, CVerheij, TGoossens, HLittle, PCals, JBACKGROUND: In a pan-European randomised controlled trial (GRACE INTRO) of two interventions, (i) a point-of-care C-reactive protein test and/or (ii) training in communication skills and use of an interactive patient booklet, both interventions resulted in large reductions in antibiotic prescribing for acute cough. AIMS: This process evaluation explored patients' views of primary care consultations using the two interventions in six European countries. METHODS: Sixty-two interviews were conducted with patients who had participated in the GRACE INTRO trial. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and translated into English where necessary. Analysis used techniques from thematic and framework analysis. RESULTS: Most patients were satisfied with their consultation despite many not receiving an antibiotic. Patients appeared to accept the use of both intervention approaches. A minority, but particularly in the trial arm with both interventions, reported that they would wait longer before consulting for cough in future. CONCLUSIONS: Patients perceived that both interventions supported the general practitioner's (GP's) prescribing decisions by helping them understand when an antibiotic was, and was not, needed. Patients consulting with acute cough had largely positive views about the GP's enhanced communication skills, which included understanding their concerns, and the use of a near-patient test as an additional investigation.
spellingShingle Tonkin-Crine, S
Anthierens, S
Francis, N
Brugman, C
Fernandez-Vandellos, P
Krawczyk, J
Llor, C
Yardley, L
Coenen, S
Godycki-Cwirko, M
Butler, C
Verheij, T
Goossens, H
Little, P
Cals, J
Exploring patients' views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study.
title Exploring patients' views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study.
title_full Exploring patients' views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study.
title_fullStr Exploring patients' views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study.
title_full_unstemmed Exploring patients' views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study.
title_short Exploring patients' views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough: a six-country European qualitative study.
title_sort exploring patients views of primary care consultations with contrasting interventions for acute cough a six country european qualitative study
work_keys_str_mv AT tonkincrines exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT anthierenss exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT francisn exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT brugmanc exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT fernandezvandellosp exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT krawczykj exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT llorc exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT yardleyl exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT coenens exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT godyckicwirkom exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT butlerc exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT verheijt exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT goossensh exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT littlep exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy
AT calsj exploringpatientsviewsofprimarycareconsultationswithcontrastinginterventionsforacutecoughasixcountryeuropeanqualitativestudy