Comparison of scores on Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Depression subscale scores by administration mode: an individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis
Administration mode of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may influence responses. We assessed if Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale (HADS-D) item responses and scores were associa...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2024
|
| _version_ | 1811141070827814912 |
|---|---|
| author | Harel, D Wu, Y Levis, B Fan, S Sun, Y Xu, M Rice, DB Boruff, J Markham, S Ioannidis, JPA Takwoingi, Y Patten, SB Ziegelstein, RC Cuijpers, P Gilbody, S Vigod, S Akena, D Benedetti, A Thombs, BD DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration Stein, A |
| author_facet | Harel, D Wu, Y Levis, B Fan, S Sun, Y Xu, M Rice, DB Boruff, J Markham, S Ioannidis, JPA Takwoingi, Y Patten, SB Ziegelstein, RC Cuijpers, P Gilbody, S Vigod, S Akena, D Benedetti, A Thombs, BD DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration Stein, A |
| author_sort | Harel, D |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | Administration mode of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may influence responses. We assessed if Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale (HADS-D) item responses and scores were associated with administration mode. We compared (1) self-administration versus interview-administration; within self-administration (2) research or medical setting versus private; and (3) pen-and-paper versus electronic; and within interview-administration (4) in-person versus phone. We analysed individual participant data meta-analysis datasets with item-level data for the PHQ-9 (N = 34,529), EPDS (N = 16,813), and HADS-D (N = 16,768). We used multiple indicator multiple cause models to assess differential item functioning (DIF) by administration mode. We found statistically significant DIF for most items on all measures due to large samples, but influence on total scores was negligible. In 10 comparisons conducted across the PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D, Pearson's correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients between latent depression symptom scores from models that did or did not account for DIF were between 0.995 and 1.000. Total PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D scores did not differ materially across administration modes. Researcher and clinicians who evaluate depression symptoms with these questionnaires can select administration methods based on patient preferences, feasibility, or cost. |
| first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:32:02Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:84ab4e6b-e207-449d-ba66-bc39a4a634f6 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:32:02Z |
| publishDate | 2024 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:84ab4e6b-e207-449d-ba66-bc39a4a634f62024-08-29T12:09:45ZComparison of scores on Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Depression subscale scores by administration mode: an individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:84ab4e6b-e207-449d-ba66-bc39a4a634f6EnglishSymplectic ElementsElsevier2024Harel, DWu, YLevis, BFan, SSun, YXu, MRice, DBBoruff, JMarkham, SIoannidis, JPATakwoingi, YPatten, SBZiegelstein, RCCuijpers, PGilbody, SVigod, SAkena, DBenedetti, AThombs, BDDEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) CollaborationStein, AAdministration mode of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) may influence responses. We assessed if Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale (HADS-D) item responses and scores were associated with administration mode. We compared (1) self-administration versus interview-administration; within self-administration (2) research or medical setting versus private; and (3) pen-and-paper versus electronic; and within interview-administration (4) in-person versus phone. We analysed individual participant data meta-analysis datasets with item-level data for the PHQ-9 (N = 34,529), EPDS (N = 16,813), and HADS-D (N = 16,768). We used multiple indicator multiple cause models to assess differential item functioning (DIF) by administration mode. We found statistically significant DIF for most items on all measures due to large samples, but influence on total scores was negligible. In 10 comparisons conducted across the PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D, Pearson's correlations and intraclass correlation coefficients between latent depression symptom scores from models that did or did not account for DIF were between 0.995 and 1.000. Total PHQ-9, EPDS, and HADS-D scores did not differ materially across administration modes. Researcher and clinicians who evaluate depression symptoms with these questionnaires can select administration methods based on patient preferences, feasibility, or cost. |
| spellingShingle | Harel, D Wu, Y Levis, B Fan, S Sun, Y Xu, M Rice, DB Boruff, J Markham, S Ioannidis, JPA Takwoingi, Y Patten, SB Ziegelstein, RC Cuijpers, P Gilbody, S Vigod, S Akena, D Benedetti, A Thombs, BD DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration Stein, A Comparison of scores on Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Depression subscale scores by administration mode: an individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis |
| title | Comparison of scores on Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Depression subscale scores by administration mode: an individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis |
| title_full | Comparison of scores on Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Depression subscale scores by administration mode: an individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of scores on Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Depression subscale scores by administration mode: an individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of scores on Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Depression subscale scores by administration mode: an individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis |
| title_short | Comparison of scores on Patient Health Questionnaire-9, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression - Depression subscale scores by administration mode: an individual participant data differential item functioning meta-analysis |
| title_sort | comparison of scores on patient health questionnaire 9 edinburgh postnatal depression scale and hospital anxiety and depression depression subscale scores by administration mode an individual participant data differential item functioning meta analysis |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hareld comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT wuy comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT levisb comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT fans comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT suny comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT xum comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT ricedb comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT boruffj comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT markhams comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT ioannidisjpa comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT takwoingiy comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT pattensb comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT ziegelsteinrc comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT cuijpersp comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT gilbodys comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT vigods comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT akenad comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT benedettia comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT thombsbd comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT depressionscreeningdatadepressdcollaboration comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis AT steina comparisonofscoresonpatienthealthquestionnaire9edinburghpostnataldepressionscaleandhospitalanxietyanddepressiondepressionsubscalescoresbyadministrationmodeanindividualparticipantdatadifferentialitemfunctioningmetaanalysis |