Effectiveness analyses may underestimate protection of infants after group C meningococcal immunization

Background. Group C meningococcal conjugate-vaccine effectiveness in the United Kingdom declines from ~90% in the first year to 0% between 1 and 4 years after immunization in infants immunized at 2, 3, and 4 months of age and to 61% in toddlers given a single dose. Confidence intervals are wide, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vu, D, Kelly, D, Heath, P, McCarthy, N, Pollard, A, Granoff, D
Other Authors: Infectious Diseases Society of America
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: University of Chicago Press 2006
Subjects:
_version_ 1826282587325202432
author Vu, D
Kelly, D
Heath, P
McCarthy, N
Pollard, A
Granoff, D
author2 Infectious Diseases Society of America
author_facet Infectious Diseases Society of America
Vu, D
Kelly, D
Heath, P
McCarthy, N
Pollard, A
Granoff, D
author_sort Vu, D
collection OXFORD
description Background. Group C meningococcal conjugate-vaccine effectiveness in the United Kingdom declines from ~90% in the first year to 0% between 1 and 4 years after immunization in infants immunized at 2, 3, and 4 months of age and to 61% in toddlers given a single dose. Confidence intervals are wide, and the extent of protection is uncertain. Methods. Serum samples were obtained from children 3-5 years of age who were participants in a preschool booster-vaccine trial. Serum bacterial activity was measured with human complement. Group C anticapsular antibody concentrations were measured by a radioantigen binding assay. Passive protection was analyzed in a infant rat bacteremia model. Results. Serum samples from UK children who had been immunized 2-3 years earlier as infants or toddlers had higher levels of radioantigen binding, bacterial activity, and passive protection than did historical control serum samples from unimmunized children (P<.05). A higher proportion of children immunized as infants had serum bactericidal activity tiers ≥ 1:4 (considered to be protective) than those immunized as toddlers (61% vs. 24%; P<.01), but there were no significant differences in the proportion of serum samples conferring passive protection (50% and 41%, respectively; P=.4). Conclusions. We found no evidence of lower immunity in children immunized as infants than as toddlers. On the basis of serum bactericidal activity and/or passive protection, 40%-50% of both age groups are protected at 2-3 years after immunization, which was significantly greater than in unimmunized historical controls (<5%).
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:46:06Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:84b67169-71c5-48a5-8cef-c772c4c2fe96
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:46:06Z
publishDate 2006
publisher University of Chicago Press
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:84b67169-71c5-48a5-8cef-c772c4c2fe962022-03-26T21:52:55ZEffectiveness analyses may underestimate protection of infants after group C meningococcal immunizationJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:84b67169-71c5-48a5-8cef-c772c4c2fe96VaccinologyZoological sciencesPaediatricsEnglishOxford University Research Archive - ValetUniversity of Chicago Press2006Vu, DKelly, DHeath, PMcCarthy, NPollard, AGranoff, DInfectious Diseases Society of AmericaBackground. Group C meningococcal conjugate-vaccine effectiveness in the United Kingdom declines from ~90% in the first year to 0% between 1 and 4 years after immunization in infants immunized at 2, 3, and 4 months of age and to 61% in toddlers given a single dose. Confidence intervals are wide, and the extent of protection is uncertain. Methods. Serum samples were obtained from children 3-5 years of age who were participants in a preschool booster-vaccine trial. Serum bacterial activity was measured with human complement. Group C anticapsular antibody concentrations were measured by a radioantigen binding assay. Passive protection was analyzed in a infant rat bacteremia model. Results. Serum samples from UK children who had been immunized 2-3 years earlier as infants or toddlers had higher levels of radioantigen binding, bacterial activity, and passive protection than did historical control serum samples from unimmunized children (P<.05). A higher proportion of children immunized as infants had serum bactericidal activity tiers ≥ 1:4 (considered to be protective) than those immunized as toddlers (61% vs. 24%; P<.01), but there were no significant differences in the proportion of serum samples conferring passive protection (50% and 41%, respectively; P=.4). Conclusions. We found no evidence of lower immunity in children immunized as infants than as toddlers. On the basis of serum bactericidal activity and/or passive protection, 40%-50% of both age groups are protected at 2-3 years after immunization, which was significantly greater than in unimmunized historical controls (<5%).
spellingShingle Vaccinology
Zoological sciences
Paediatrics
Vu, D
Kelly, D
Heath, P
McCarthy, N
Pollard, A
Granoff, D
Effectiveness analyses may underestimate protection of infants after group C meningococcal immunization
title Effectiveness analyses may underestimate protection of infants after group C meningococcal immunization
title_full Effectiveness analyses may underestimate protection of infants after group C meningococcal immunization
title_fullStr Effectiveness analyses may underestimate protection of infants after group C meningococcal immunization
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness analyses may underestimate protection of infants after group C meningococcal immunization
title_short Effectiveness analyses may underestimate protection of infants after group C meningococcal immunization
title_sort effectiveness analyses may underestimate protection of infants after group c meningococcal immunization
topic Vaccinology
Zoological sciences
Paediatrics
work_keys_str_mv AT vud effectivenessanalysesmayunderestimateprotectionofinfantsaftergroupcmeningococcalimmunization
AT kellyd effectivenessanalysesmayunderestimateprotectionofinfantsaftergroupcmeningococcalimmunization
AT heathp effectivenessanalysesmayunderestimateprotectionofinfantsaftergroupcmeningococcalimmunization
AT mccarthyn effectivenessanalysesmayunderestimateprotectionofinfantsaftergroupcmeningococcalimmunization
AT pollarda effectivenessanalysesmayunderestimateprotectionofinfantsaftergroupcmeningococcalimmunization
AT granoffd effectivenessanalysesmayunderestimateprotectionofinfantsaftergroupcmeningococcalimmunization