Creating landscapes of coexistence: Do conservation interventions promote tolerance of lions in human-dominated landscapes?

The range-wide decline of lions has led to their conservation becoming a top priority. Protection of free-ranging lion populations is dependent on securing space for lions but also on the ability and desire of local communities to coexist with lions. Our investigation takes a comparative and case st...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Western, G, Macdonald, D, Loveridge, A, Dickman, A
Format: Journal article
Published: Medknow 2019
_version_ 1797079553571553280
author Western, G
Macdonald, D
Loveridge, A
Dickman, A
author_facet Western, G
Macdonald, D
Loveridge, A
Dickman, A
author_sort Western, G
collection OXFORD
description The range-wide decline of lions has led to their conservation becoming a top priority. Protection of free-ranging lion populations is dependent on securing space for lions but also on the ability and desire of local communities to coexist with lions. Our investigation takes a comparative and case study approach to explore the individual and societal desire to maintain current lion populations alongside communities in, or surrounding, Zimbabwe's Hwange National Park, Tanzania's Ruaha National Park, and Kenya's southern Maasailand. Using data from attitudinal questionnaire surveys, we compare the desire to maintain current lion populations as well as the prevalence and success of conservation interventions aimed at increasing human-lion coexistence. In Maasailand, 88% of the respondents expressed a desire to see current lion populations maintained, while only 42% of the respondents in Ruaha and only 5% of the respondents in Hwange expressed this desire. More respondents reported predation by lions (lion predation) on livestock in Maasailand than in Hwange; personal benefits from conservation were greatest in Maasailand; and exposure to conservation education was highest in Ruaha. The Hwange findings were confounded by Zimbabwe's political and economic climate. In Ruaha and Maasailand, communal and individual conservation benefits influenced desired changes to lion population. Once variation between sites was controlled for, twinning personal benefits and conservation education together was most likely to increase an individual's desire to see current lion populations maintained.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:47:35Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8539bc7a-1c06-48be-bd9a-a5cceee30991
institution University of Oxford
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:47:35Z
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8539bc7a-1c06-48be-bd9a-a5cceee309912022-03-26T21:56:03ZCreating landscapes of coexistence: Do conservation interventions promote tolerance of lions in human-dominated landscapes?Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8539bc7a-1c06-48be-bd9a-a5cceee30991Symplectic Elements at OxfordMedknow2019Western, GMacdonald, DLoveridge, ADickman, AThe range-wide decline of lions has led to their conservation becoming a top priority. Protection of free-ranging lion populations is dependent on securing space for lions but also on the ability and desire of local communities to coexist with lions. Our investigation takes a comparative and case study approach to explore the individual and societal desire to maintain current lion populations alongside communities in, or surrounding, Zimbabwe's Hwange National Park, Tanzania's Ruaha National Park, and Kenya's southern Maasailand. Using data from attitudinal questionnaire surveys, we compare the desire to maintain current lion populations as well as the prevalence and success of conservation interventions aimed at increasing human-lion coexistence. In Maasailand, 88% of the respondents expressed a desire to see current lion populations maintained, while only 42% of the respondents in Ruaha and only 5% of the respondents in Hwange expressed this desire. More respondents reported predation by lions (lion predation) on livestock in Maasailand than in Hwange; personal benefits from conservation were greatest in Maasailand; and exposure to conservation education was highest in Ruaha. The Hwange findings were confounded by Zimbabwe's political and economic climate. In Ruaha and Maasailand, communal and individual conservation benefits influenced desired changes to lion population. Once variation between sites was controlled for, twinning personal benefits and conservation education together was most likely to increase an individual's desire to see current lion populations maintained.
spellingShingle Western, G
Macdonald, D
Loveridge, A
Dickman, A
Creating landscapes of coexistence: Do conservation interventions promote tolerance of lions in human-dominated landscapes?
title Creating landscapes of coexistence: Do conservation interventions promote tolerance of lions in human-dominated landscapes?
title_full Creating landscapes of coexistence: Do conservation interventions promote tolerance of lions in human-dominated landscapes?
title_fullStr Creating landscapes of coexistence: Do conservation interventions promote tolerance of lions in human-dominated landscapes?
title_full_unstemmed Creating landscapes of coexistence: Do conservation interventions promote tolerance of lions in human-dominated landscapes?
title_short Creating landscapes of coexistence: Do conservation interventions promote tolerance of lions in human-dominated landscapes?
title_sort creating landscapes of coexistence do conservation interventions promote tolerance of lions in human dominated landscapes
work_keys_str_mv AT westerng creatinglandscapesofcoexistencedoconservationinterventionspromotetoleranceoflionsinhumandominatedlandscapes
AT macdonaldd creatinglandscapesofcoexistencedoconservationinterventionspromotetoleranceoflionsinhumandominatedlandscapes
AT loveridgea creatinglandscapesofcoexistencedoconservationinterventionspromotetoleranceoflionsinhumandominatedlandscapes
AT dickmana creatinglandscapesofcoexistencedoconservationinterventionspromotetoleranceoflionsinhumandominatedlandscapes