Feasibility and acceptability of community coronavirus disease 2019 testing strategies (FACTS) in a university setting
<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, the UK government began a mass severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing program. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of organized...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
_version_ | 1811139728128344064 |
---|---|
author | Hirst, JA Logan, M Fanshawe, TR Mwandigha, L Wanat, M Vicary, C Perera, R Tonkin-Crine, S Lee, JJ Tracey, I Duff, G Tufano, P Besharov, M Tarassenko, L Nicholson, BD Hobbs, FDR |
author_facet | Hirst, JA Logan, M Fanshawe, TR Mwandigha, L Wanat, M Vicary, C Perera, R Tonkin-Crine, S Lee, JJ Tracey, I Duff, G Tufano, P Besharov, M Tarassenko, L Nicholson, BD Hobbs, FDR |
author_sort | Hirst, JA |
collection | OXFORD |
description | <p><strong>Background: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, the UK government began a mass severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing program. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of organized regular self-testing for SARS-CoV-2.</p>
<p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed-methods observational cohort study in asymptomatic students and staff at University of Oxford, who performed SARS-CoV-2 antigen lateral flow self-testing. Data on uptake and adherence, acceptability, and test interpretation were collected via a smartphone app, an online survey, and qualitative interviews.</p>
<p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 3 main sites, 551 participants (25% of those invited) performed 2728 tests during a follow-up of 5.6 weeks; 447 participants (81%) completed at least 2 tests, and 340 (62%) completed at least 4. The survey, completed by 214 participants (39%), found that 98% of people were confident to self-test and believed self-testing to be beneficial. Acceptability of self-testing was high, with 91% of ratings being acceptable or very acceptable. A total of 2711 (99.4%) test results were negative, 9 were positive, and 8 were inconclusive. Results from 18 qualitative interviews with students and staff revealed that participants valued regular testing, but there were concerns about test accuracy that impacted uptake and adherence.</p>
<p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to assess feasibility and acceptability of regular SARS-CoV-2 self-testing. It provides evidence to inform recruitment for, adherence to, and acceptability of regular SARS-CoV-2 self-testing programs for asymptomatic individuals using lateral flow tests. We found that self-testing is acceptable and people were able to interpret results accurately.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:10:42Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:853d9b69-45eb-419e-b98e-ef2a943730c6 |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-09-25T04:10:42Z |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:853d9b69-45eb-419e-b98e-ef2a943730c62024-06-20T09:27:15ZFeasibility and acceptability of community coronavirus disease 2019 testing strategies (FACTS) in a university settingJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:853d9b69-45eb-419e-b98e-ef2a943730c6EnglishSymplectic ElementsOxford University Press2021Hirst, JALogan, MFanshawe, TRMwandigha, LWanat, MVicary, CPerera, RTonkin-Crine, SLee, JJTracey, IDuff, GTufano, PBesharov, MTarassenko, LNicholson, BDHobbs, FDR<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in 2020, the UK government began a mass severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing program. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of organized regular self-testing for SARS-CoV-2.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a mixed-methods observational cohort study in asymptomatic students and staff at University of Oxford, who performed SARS-CoV-2 antigen lateral flow self-testing. Data on uptake and adherence, acceptability, and test interpretation were collected via a smartphone app, an online survey, and qualitative interviews.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Across 3 main sites, 551 participants (25% of those invited) performed 2728 tests during a follow-up of 5.6 weeks; 447 participants (81%) completed at least 2 tests, and 340 (62%) completed at least 4. The survey, completed by 214 participants (39%), found that 98% of people were confident to self-test and believed self-testing to be beneficial. Acceptability of self-testing was high, with 91% of ratings being acceptable or very acceptable. A total of 2711 (99.4%) test results were negative, 9 were positive, and 8 were inconclusive. Results from 18 qualitative interviews with students and staff revealed that participants valued regular testing, but there were concerns about test accuracy that impacted uptake and adherence.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first study to assess feasibility and acceptability of regular SARS-CoV-2 self-testing. It provides evidence to inform recruitment for, adherence to, and acceptability of regular SARS-CoV-2 self-testing programs for asymptomatic individuals using lateral flow tests. We found that self-testing is acceptable and people were able to interpret results accurately.</p> |
spellingShingle | Hirst, JA Logan, M Fanshawe, TR Mwandigha, L Wanat, M Vicary, C Perera, R Tonkin-Crine, S Lee, JJ Tracey, I Duff, G Tufano, P Besharov, M Tarassenko, L Nicholson, BD Hobbs, FDR Feasibility and acceptability of community coronavirus disease 2019 testing strategies (FACTS) in a university setting |
title | Feasibility and acceptability of community coronavirus disease 2019 testing strategies (FACTS) in a university setting |
title_full | Feasibility and acceptability of community coronavirus disease 2019 testing strategies (FACTS) in a university setting |
title_fullStr | Feasibility and acceptability of community coronavirus disease 2019 testing strategies (FACTS) in a university setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Feasibility and acceptability of community coronavirus disease 2019 testing strategies (FACTS) in a university setting |
title_short | Feasibility and acceptability of community coronavirus disease 2019 testing strategies (FACTS) in a university setting |
title_sort | feasibility and acceptability of community coronavirus disease 2019 testing strategies facts in a university setting |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hirstja feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT loganm feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT fanshawetr feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT mwandighal feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT wanatm feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT vicaryc feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT pererar feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT tonkincrines feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT leejj feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT traceyi feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT duffg feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT tufanop feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT besharovm feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT tarassenkol feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT nicholsonbd feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting AT hobbsfdr feasibilityandacceptabilityofcommunitycoronavirusdisease2019testingstrategiesfactsinauniversitysetting |