Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: Postal questionnaire surveys

Objective: To study the career progression of NHS doctors, comparing men and women. Design: Postal questionnaire surveys. Participants and setting: Graduates of 1977, 1988, and 1993 from all UK medical schools. Results: The response rate was 68% (7012/10 344). Within general practice, 97% (1208/1243...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Taylor, K, Lambert, T, Goldacre, M
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: 2009
_version_ 1797079591973552128
author Taylor, K
Lambert, T
Goldacre, M
author_facet Taylor, K
Lambert, T
Goldacre, M
author_sort Taylor, K
collection OXFORD
description Objective: To study the career progression of NHS doctors, comparing men and women. Design: Postal questionnaire surveys. Participants and setting: Graduates of 1977, 1988, and 1993 from all UK medical schools. Results: The response rate was 68% (7012/10 344). Within general practice, 97% (1208/1243) of men, 99% (264/267) of women who had always worked full time throughout their career, and 87% (1083/1248) of all women were principals. Median times from qualification to principal status were 5.8 (95% confidence interval 5.6 to 6.0) years for men, 5.6 (5.4 to 5.8) years for women who had worked full time during training, and 6.8 (6.5 to 7.0) years for all women. Of the 1977 and 1988 graduates in hospital practice, 96% (1293/1347) of men were consultants, compared with 92% (276/299) of women who had always worked full time throughout their career and 67% (277/416) of women who had not. Median time to first consultant post was 11.7 (11.5 to 11.9) years for men, 11.3 (11.0 to 11.6) years for women who worked full time during training, and 12.3 (12.0 to 12.6) years for all women. Women who had not always worked full time throughout their career were over-represented in general practice and under-represented in most hospital specialties, substantially so in the surgical specialties and anaesthetics. Women who had always worked full time were under-represented not only in the surgical specialties but also in general practice. Conclusions: Women not progressing as far and as fast as men was, generally, a reflection of not having always worked full time rather than their sex. The findings suggest that women do not generally encounter direct discrimination; however, the possibility that indirect discrimination, such as lack of opportunities for part time work, has influenced choice of specialty cannot be ruled out.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:48:09Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:856814f4-5e1d-4e9d-8898-9b49ee87d99d
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:48:09Z
publishDate 2009
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:856814f4-5e1d-4e9d-8898-9b49ee87d99d2022-03-26T21:57:23ZCareer progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: Postal questionnaire surveysJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:856814f4-5e1d-4e9d-8898-9b49ee87d99dEnglishSymplectic Elements at Oxford2009Taylor, KLambert, TGoldacre, MObjective: To study the career progression of NHS doctors, comparing men and women. Design: Postal questionnaire surveys. Participants and setting: Graduates of 1977, 1988, and 1993 from all UK medical schools. Results: The response rate was 68% (7012/10 344). Within general practice, 97% (1208/1243) of men, 99% (264/267) of women who had always worked full time throughout their career, and 87% (1083/1248) of all women were principals. Median times from qualification to principal status were 5.8 (95% confidence interval 5.6 to 6.0) years for men, 5.6 (5.4 to 5.8) years for women who had worked full time during training, and 6.8 (6.5 to 7.0) years for all women. Of the 1977 and 1988 graduates in hospital practice, 96% (1293/1347) of men were consultants, compared with 92% (276/299) of women who had always worked full time throughout their career and 67% (277/416) of women who had not. Median time to first consultant post was 11.7 (11.5 to 11.9) years for men, 11.3 (11.0 to 11.6) years for women who worked full time during training, and 12.3 (12.0 to 12.6) years for all women. Women who had not always worked full time throughout their career were over-represented in general practice and under-represented in most hospital specialties, substantially so in the surgical specialties and anaesthetics. Women who had always worked full time were under-represented not only in the surgical specialties but also in general practice. Conclusions: Women not progressing as far and as fast as men was, generally, a reflection of not having always worked full time rather than their sex. The findings suggest that women do not generally encounter direct discrimination; however, the possibility that indirect discrimination, such as lack of opportunities for part time work, has influenced choice of specialty cannot be ruled out.
spellingShingle Taylor, K
Lambert, T
Goldacre, M
Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: Postal questionnaire surveys
title Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: Postal questionnaire surveys
title_full Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: Postal questionnaire surveys
title_fullStr Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: Postal questionnaire surveys
title_full_unstemmed Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: Postal questionnaire surveys
title_short Career progression and destinations, comparing men and women in the NHS: Postal questionnaire surveys
title_sort career progression and destinations comparing men and women in the nhs postal questionnaire surveys
work_keys_str_mv AT taylork careerprogressionanddestinationscomparingmenandwomeninthenhspostalquestionnairesurveys
AT lambertt careerprogressionanddestinationscomparingmenandwomeninthenhspostalquestionnairesurveys
AT goldacrem careerprogressionanddestinationscomparingmenandwomeninthenhspostalquestionnairesurveys