Current controversies and irresolvable disagreement: the case of Vincent Lambert and the role of ‘dissensus’
Controversial cases in medical ethics are, by their very nature, divisive. There are disagreements that revolve around questions of fact or of value. Ethical debate may help in resolving those disagreements. However, sometimes in such cases, there are opposing reasonable views arising from deep-seat...
Main Authors: | Wilkinson, D, Savulescu, J |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Similar Items
-
In Favour of Medical Dissensus: Why We Should Agree to Disagree About End-of-Life Decisions.
by: Wilkinson, D, et al.
Published: (2015) -
Contested boundaries: consensus and dissensus in European attitudes to immigration
by: Heath, AF, et al.
Published: (2019) -
Disagreement, mediation, arbitration: resolving disputes about medical treatment
by: Wilkinson, DJC, et al.
Published: (2018) -
The epistemic significance of religious disagreements: cases of unconfirmed superiority disagreements
by: Choo, Frederick Wen Yeong
Published: (2022) -
Public disagreement
by: Sethi, Rajiv, et al.
Published: (2011)