Reply to Westaway and Lyman: Emus, dingoes, and archaeology’s role in conservation biology
In a curious comment on our PNAS Perspective, Westaway and Lyman offer two Australian zooarchaeological case studies—one involving eggshells and the other dingoes—that they argue undercut one of our main points: that archaeological data and deep time perspectives have much to offer conservation biol...
Main Authors: | Larson, G, Zeder, M, Denham, T, Erlandson, J, Boivin, N, Crowther, A, Fuller, D, Petraglia, M |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
National Academy of Sciences
2016
|
Similar Items
-
Reply to Ellis et al.: Human niche construction and evolutionary theory
by: Larson, G, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Reply to comment by Rob Westaway on "Late Cenozoic reorganization of the Arabia-Eurasia collision and the comparison of short-term and long-term deformation rates"
by: Allen, M, et al.
Published: (2004) -
Ecological consequences of human niche construction: Examining long-term anthropogenic shaping of global species distributions
by: Larson, G, et al.
Published: (2016) -
Love and the Dingo
by: Carol Freeman
Published: (2012-09-01) -
In Defence of the Dingo
by: Nerina Caltabiano
Published: (2003-03-01)