‘Maternal request’ caesarean sections and medical necessity

Currently, many women who are expecting to give birth have no option but to attempt vaginal delivery, since access to elective planned caesarean sections (PCS) in the absence of what is deemed to constitute ‘clinical need’ is variable. In this paper, we argue that PCS should be routinely offered to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brown, R, Mulligan, A
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publications 2023
_version_ 1826311233539670016
author Brown, R
Mulligan, A
author_facet Brown, R
Mulligan, A
author_sort Brown, R
collection OXFORD
description Currently, many women who are expecting to give birth have no option but to attempt vaginal delivery, since access to elective planned caesarean sections (PCS) in the absence of what is deemed to constitute ‘clinical need’ is variable. In this paper, we argue that PCS should be routinely offered to women who are expecting to give birth, and that the risks and benefits of PCS as compared with planned vaginal delivery should be discussed with them. Currently, discussions of elective PCS arise in the context of what are called ‘Maternal Request Caesarean Sections’ (MRCS) and there is a good deal of support for the position that women who request PCS without clinical indication should be provided with them. Our argument goes further than support for acceding to requests for MRCS: we submit that healthcare practitioners caring for women with uncomplicated pregnancies have a positive duty to inform them of the option of PCS as opposed to assuming vaginal delivery as a default, and to provide (or arrange for the provision of) PCS if that is the woman's preferred manner of delivery.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T08:06:45Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:86148473-3fa9-44f8-91e8-64cae584f4b2
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T08:06:45Z
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:86148473-3fa9-44f8-91e8-64cae584f4b22023-11-02T09:10:26Z‘Maternal request’ caesarean sections and medical necessityJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:86148473-3fa9-44f8-91e8-64cae584f4b2EnglishSymplectic ElementsSAGE Publications2023Brown, RMulligan, ACurrently, many women who are expecting to give birth have no option but to attempt vaginal delivery, since access to elective planned caesarean sections (PCS) in the absence of what is deemed to constitute ‘clinical need’ is variable. In this paper, we argue that PCS should be routinely offered to women who are expecting to give birth, and that the risks and benefits of PCS as compared with planned vaginal delivery should be discussed with them. Currently, discussions of elective PCS arise in the context of what are called ‘Maternal Request Caesarean Sections’ (MRCS) and there is a good deal of support for the position that women who request PCS without clinical indication should be provided with them. Our argument goes further than support for acceding to requests for MRCS: we submit that healthcare practitioners caring for women with uncomplicated pregnancies have a positive duty to inform them of the option of PCS as opposed to assuming vaginal delivery as a default, and to provide (or arrange for the provision of) PCS if that is the woman's preferred manner of delivery.
spellingShingle Brown, R
Mulligan, A
‘Maternal request’ caesarean sections and medical necessity
title ‘Maternal request’ caesarean sections and medical necessity
title_full ‘Maternal request’ caesarean sections and medical necessity
title_fullStr ‘Maternal request’ caesarean sections and medical necessity
title_full_unstemmed ‘Maternal request’ caesarean sections and medical necessity
title_short ‘Maternal request’ caesarean sections and medical necessity
title_sort maternal request caesarean sections and medical necessity
work_keys_str_mv AT brownr maternalrequestcaesareansectionsandmedicalnecessity
AT mulligana maternalrequestcaesareansectionsandmedicalnecessity