Bubbles under the wallpaper: healthcare rationing and discrimination
It is common to allocate scarce health care resources by maximizing QALYs per dollar. This approach has been attacked by disability-rights advocates, policy-makers, and ethicists on the grounds that it unjustly discriminates against the disabled. The main complaint is that the QALYmaximizing approac...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Other Authors: | |
| Format: | Book section |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2015
|
| _version_ | 1826312254230888448 |
|---|---|
| author | Beckstead, N Ord, T |
| author2 | Kuhse, H |
| author_facet | Kuhse, H Beckstead, N Ord, T |
| author_sort | Beckstead, N |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | It is common to allocate scarce health care resources by maximizing QALYs per dollar. This approach has been attacked by disability-rights advocates, policy-makers, and ethicists on the grounds that it unjustly discriminates against the disabled. The main complaint is that the QALYmaximizing approach implies a seemingly unsatisfactory conclusion: other things being equal, we should direct life-saving treatment to the healthy rather than the disabled. This argument pays insufficient attention to the downsides of the potential alternatives. We show that this sort of discrimination is one of four unpalatable consequences that any approach to priority setting in health care must face. We argue that, given the alternatives, it is far from clear that we should revise the QALYmaximizing approach in response to this objection. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T08:26:20Z |
| format | Book section |
| id | oxford-uuid:862e038b-da89-40fa-8636-ebd604420bd2 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T08:26:20Z |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher | Wiley-Blackwell |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:862e038b-da89-40fa-8636-ebd604420bd22024-02-15T11:35:08ZBubbles under the wallpaper: healthcare rationing and discriminationBook sectionhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_1843uuid:862e038b-da89-40fa-8636-ebd604420bd2EnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley-Blackwell2015Beckstead, NOrd, TKuhse, HSchüklenk, USinger, PIt is common to allocate scarce health care resources by maximizing QALYs per dollar. This approach has been attacked by disability-rights advocates, policy-makers, and ethicists on the grounds that it unjustly discriminates against the disabled. The main complaint is that the QALYmaximizing approach implies a seemingly unsatisfactory conclusion: other things being equal, we should direct life-saving treatment to the healthy rather than the disabled. This argument pays insufficient attention to the downsides of the potential alternatives. We show that this sort of discrimination is one of four unpalatable consequences that any approach to priority setting in health care must face. We argue that, given the alternatives, it is far from clear that we should revise the QALYmaximizing approach in response to this objection. |
| spellingShingle | Beckstead, N Ord, T Bubbles under the wallpaper: healthcare rationing and discrimination |
| title | Bubbles under the wallpaper: healthcare rationing and discrimination |
| title_full | Bubbles under the wallpaper: healthcare rationing and discrimination |
| title_fullStr | Bubbles under the wallpaper: healthcare rationing and discrimination |
| title_full_unstemmed | Bubbles under the wallpaper: healthcare rationing and discrimination |
| title_short | Bubbles under the wallpaper: healthcare rationing and discrimination |
| title_sort | bubbles under the wallpaper healthcare rationing and discrimination |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT becksteadn bubblesunderthewallpaperhealthcarerationinganddiscrimination AT ordt bubblesunderthewallpaperhealthcarerationinganddiscrimination |