Mind the (inferential) gap: Giles et al. (2018) provide no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between interceptive-timing ability and arithmetic attainment
In a recent article, Giles et al. (2018) stated that “Piaget proposed that sensorimotor interactions with the environment underpin the development of cognitive representations, including our understanding of number” (p. 1335). They went on to argue for a specific causal connection between the develo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Journal article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
SAGE Publications
2019
|
| _version_ | 1797079884026085376 |
|---|---|
| author | Hulme, C |
| author_facet | Hulme, C |
| author_sort | Hulme, C |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | In a recent article, Giles et al. (2018) stated that “Piaget proposed that sensorimotor interactions with the environment underpin the development of cognitive representations, including our understanding of number” (p. 1335). They went on to argue for a specific causal connection between the development of interceptive-timing ability and arithmetic. Here, I argue that their study provides no convincing evidence for such a causal interpretation |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:52:13Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:86c6fda2-f2c4-4537-9543-371461cf17b6 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:52:13Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | SAGE Publications |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:86c6fda2-f2c4-4537-9543-371461cf17b62022-03-26T22:06:19ZMind the (inferential) gap: Giles et al. (2018) provide no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between interceptive-timing ability and arithmetic attainmentJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:86c6fda2-f2c4-4537-9543-371461cf17b6EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordSAGE Publications2019Hulme, CIn a recent article, Giles et al. (2018) stated that “Piaget proposed that sensorimotor interactions with the environment underpin the development of cognitive representations, including our understanding of number” (p. 1335). They went on to argue for a specific causal connection between the development of interceptive-timing ability and arithmetic. Here, I argue that their study provides no convincing evidence for such a causal interpretation |
| spellingShingle | Hulme, C Mind the (inferential) gap: Giles et al. (2018) provide no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between interceptive-timing ability and arithmetic attainment |
| title | Mind the (inferential) gap: Giles et al. (2018) provide no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between interceptive-timing ability and arithmetic attainment |
| title_full | Mind the (inferential) gap: Giles et al. (2018) provide no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between interceptive-timing ability and arithmetic attainment |
| title_fullStr | Mind the (inferential) gap: Giles et al. (2018) provide no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between interceptive-timing ability and arithmetic attainment |
| title_full_unstemmed | Mind the (inferential) gap: Giles et al. (2018) provide no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between interceptive-timing ability and arithmetic attainment |
| title_short | Mind the (inferential) gap: Giles et al. (2018) provide no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between interceptive-timing ability and arithmetic attainment |
| title_sort | mind the inferential gap giles et al 2018 provide no convincing evidence for a causal relationship between interceptive timing ability and arithmetic attainment |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT hulmec mindtheinferentialgapgilesetal2018providenoconvincingevidenceforacausalrelationshipbetweeninterceptivetimingabilityandarithmeticattainment |