Sociality against the state: the anthropology of Pierre Clastres

Clastres ‘de-substantializes' the state, which is not ‘the Elysium, the White House, the Kremlin,' but ‘an actualization of a relation of power.' There is no reason, therefore, to believe that, in a Durkheimian mood, he has reified society. Even though he makes no use of the concept,...

Deskribapen osoa

Xehetasun bibliografikoak
Egile nagusia: Barbosa, G
Formatua: Journal article
Hizkuntza:English
Argitaratua: Anthropological Society of Oxford 2017
_version_ 1826314175553470464
author Barbosa, G
author_facet Barbosa, G
author_sort Barbosa, G
collection OXFORD
description Clastres ‘de-substantializes' the state, which is not ‘the Elysium, the White House, the Kremlin,' but ‘an actualization of a relation of power.' There is no reason, therefore, to believe that, in a Durkheimian mood, he has reified society. Even though he makes no use of the concept, I believe there is already a concept of ‘sociality' at work in Clastres: hence, the idea of sociality against the state. In the three sections of this study, I show the role played by ‘society,' the ‘state' and ‘against' in Clastres's writings. In this way, I aim to demonstrate that his ethnography is filled with indications about how to deal with some of the continuing dilemmas of anthropology, such as: how can we avoid methodological individualism without becoming spellbound by a transcendental holism or vice-versa? How can we erect models of intentionality without a subject? How can we conceive of social relations without a society? And finally, how does the ‘objectivity' of sociality work through the ‘subjectivity' of personsin-interaction?
first_indexed 2024-09-25T04:28:16Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8740fbfa-4199-46b2-b0f4-9f80cfec09d0
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-09-25T04:28:16Z
publishDate 2017
publisher Anthropological Society of Oxford
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8740fbfa-4199-46b2-b0f4-9f80cfec09d02024-08-24T10:17:02ZSociality against the state: the anthropology of Pierre ClastresJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8740fbfa-4199-46b2-b0f4-9f80cfec09d0EnglishJASO_articles_33BulkUploadAnthropological Society of Oxford2017Barbosa, GClastres ‘de-substantializes' the state, which is not ‘the Elysium, the White House, the Kremlin,' but ‘an actualization of a relation of power.' There is no reason, therefore, to believe that, in a Durkheimian mood, he has reified society. Even though he makes no use of the concept, I believe there is already a concept of ‘sociality' at work in Clastres: hence, the idea of sociality against the state. In the three sections of this study, I show the role played by ‘society,' the ‘state' and ‘against' in Clastres's writings. In this way, I aim to demonstrate that his ethnography is filled with indications about how to deal with some of the continuing dilemmas of anthropology, such as: how can we avoid methodological individualism without becoming spellbound by a transcendental holism or vice-versa? How can we erect models of intentionality without a subject? How can we conceive of social relations without a society? And finally, how does the ‘objectivity' of sociality work through the ‘subjectivity' of personsin-interaction?
spellingShingle Barbosa, G
Sociality against the state: the anthropology of Pierre Clastres
title Sociality against the state: the anthropology of Pierre Clastres
title_full Sociality against the state: the anthropology of Pierre Clastres
title_fullStr Sociality against the state: the anthropology of Pierre Clastres
title_full_unstemmed Sociality against the state: the anthropology of Pierre Clastres
title_short Sociality against the state: the anthropology of Pierre Clastres
title_sort sociality against the state the anthropology of pierre clastres
work_keys_str_mv AT barbosag socialityagainstthestatetheanthropologyofpierreclastres