Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke

<h4>Objective</h4> <p>To examine factors contributing to the sex differences in functional outcomes and participation restriction after stroke.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>Individual participant data on long-term functional outcome or participation restriction...

Szczegółowa specyfikacja

Opis bibliograficzny
Główni autorzy: Phan, H, Blizzard, C, Reeves, M, Thrift, A, Cadilhac, D, Sturm, J, Heeley, E, Otahal, P, Vemmos, K, Anderson, C, Parmar, P, Krishnamurthi, R, Barker-Collo, S, Feigin, V, Bejot, Y, Cabral, N, Carolei, A, Sacco, S, Chausson, N, Olindo, S, Rothwell, P, Silva, C, Correia, M, Magalhães, R, Appelros, P, Kõrv, J, Vibo, R, Minelli, C, Gall, S
Format: Journal article
Język:English
Wydane: American Academy of Neurology 2018
_version_ 1826283132680142848
author Phan, H
Blizzard, C
Reeves, M
Thrift, A
Cadilhac, D
Sturm, J
Heeley, E
Otahal, P
Vemmos, K
Anderson, C
Parmar, P
Krishnamurthi, R
Barker-Collo, S
Feigin, V
Bejot, Y
Cabral, N
Carolei, A
Sacco, S
Chausson, N
Olindo, S
Rothwell, P
Silva, C
Correia, M
Magalhães, R
Appelros, P
Kõrv, J
Vibo, R
Minelli, C
Gall, S
author_facet Phan, H
Blizzard, C
Reeves, M
Thrift, A
Cadilhac, D
Sturm, J
Heeley, E
Otahal, P
Vemmos, K
Anderson, C
Parmar, P
Krishnamurthi, R
Barker-Collo, S
Feigin, V
Bejot, Y
Cabral, N
Carolei, A
Sacco, S
Chausson, N
Olindo, S
Rothwell, P
Silva, C
Correia, M
Magalhães, R
Appelros, P
Kõrv, J
Vibo, R
Minelli, C
Gall, S
author_sort Phan, H
collection OXFORD
description <h4>Objective</h4> <p>To examine factors contributing to the sex differences in functional outcomes and participation restriction after stroke.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>Individual participant data on long-term functional outcome or participation restriction (i.e., handicap) were obtained from 11 stroke incidence studies (1993–2014). Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to estimate the female:male relative risk (RR) of poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score &gt;2 or Barthel Index score &lt;20) at 1 year (10 studies, n = 4,852) and 5 years (7 studies, n = 2,226). Multivariable linear regression was used to compare the mean difference (MD) in participation restriction by use of the London Handicap Scale (range 0–100 with lower scores indicating poorer outcome) for women compared to men at 5 years (2 studies, n = 617). For each outcome, study-specific estimates adjusted for confounding factors (e.g., sociodemographics, stroke-related factors) were combined with the use of random-effects meta-analysis.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>In unadjusted analyses, women experienced worse functional outcomes after stroke than men (1 year: pooled RRunadjusted 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–1.48; 5 years: RRunadjusted 1.31, 95% CI 1.16–1.47). However, this difference was greatly attenuated after adjustment for age, prestroke dependency, and stroke severity (1 year: RRadjusted 1.08, 95% CI 0.97–1.20; 5 years: RRadjusted 1.05, 95% CI 0.94–1.18). Women also had greater participation restriction than men (pooled MDunadjusted −5.55, 95% CI −8.47 to −2.63), but this difference was again attenuated after adjustment for the aforementioned factors (MDadjusted −2.48, 95% CI −4.99 to 0.03).</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>Worse outcomes after stroke among women were explained mostly by age, stroke severity, and prestroke dependency, suggesting these potential targets to improve the outcomes after stroke in women.</p>
first_indexed 2024-03-07T00:54:20Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:8781f86a-96fb-439e-98c1-33fd91fabac2
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T00:54:20Z
publishDate 2018
publisher American Academy of Neurology
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:8781f86a-96fb-439e-98c1-33fd91fabac22022-03-26T22:11:11ZFactors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after strokeJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8781f86a-96fb-439e-98c1-33fd91fabac2EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordAmerican Academy of Neurology2018Phan, HBlizzard, CReeves, MThrift, ACadilhac, DSturm, JHeeley, EOtahal, PVemmos, KAnderson, CParmar, PKrishnamurthi, RBarker-Collo, SFeigin, VBejot, YCabral, NCarolei, ASacco, SChausson, NOlindo, SRothwell, PSilva, CCorreia, MMagalhães, RAppelros, PKõrv, JVibo, RMinelli, CGall, S <h4>Objective</h4> <p>To examine factors contributing to the sex differences in functional outcomes and participation restriction after stroke.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>Individual participant data on long-term functional outcome or participation restriction (i.e., handicap) were obtained from 11 stroke incidence studies (1993–2014). Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to estimate the female:male relative risk (RR) of poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score &gt;2 or Barthel Index score &lt;20) at 1 year (10 studies, n = 4,852) and 5 years (7 studies, n = 2,226). Multivariable linear regression was used to compare the mean difference (MD) in participation restriction by use of the London Handicap Scale (range 0–100 with lower scores indicating poorer outcome) for women compared to men at 5 years (2 studies, n = 617). For each outcome, study-specific estimates adjusted for confounding factors (e.g., sociodemographics, stroke-related factors) were combined with the use of random-effects meta-analysis.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>In unadjusted analyses, women experienced worse functional outcomes after stroke than men (1 year: pooled RRunadjusted 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–1.48; 5 years: RRunadjusted 1.31, 95% CI 1.16–1.47). However, this difference was greatly attenuated after adjustment for age, prestroke dependency, and stroke severity (1 year: RRadjusted 1.08, 95% CI 0.97–1.20; 5 years: RRadjusted 1.05, 95% CI 0.94–1.18). Women also had greater participation restriction than men (pooled MDunadjusted −5.55, 95% CI −8.47 to −2.63), but this difference was again attenuated after adjustment for the aforementioned factors (MDadjusted −2.48, 95% CI −4.99 to 0.03).</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>Worse outcomes after stroke among women were explained mostly by age, stroke severity, and prestroke dependency, suggesting these potential targets to improve the outcomes after stroke in women.</p>
spellingShingle Phan, H
Blizzard, C
Reeves, M
Thrift, A
Cadilhac, D
Sturm, J
Heeley, E
Otahal, P
Vemmos, K
Anderson, C
Parmar, P
Krishnamurthi, R
Barker-Collo, S
Feigin, V
Bejot, Y
Cabral, N
Carolei, A
Sacco, S
Chausson, N
Olindo, S
Rothwell, P
Silva, C
Correia, M
Magalhães, R
Appelros, P
Kõrv, J
Vibo, R
Minelli, C
Gall, S
Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke
title Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke
title_full Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke
title_fullStr Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke
title_full_unstemmed Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke
title_short Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke
title_sort factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke
work_keys_str_mv AT phanh factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT blizzardc factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT reevesm factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT thrifta factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT cadilhacd factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT sturmj factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT heeleye factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT otahalp factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT vemmosk factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT andersonc factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT parmarp factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT krishnamurthir factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT barkercollos factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT feiginv factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT bejoty factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT cabraln factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT caroleia factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT saccos factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT chaussonn factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT olindos factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT rothwellp factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT silvac factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT correiam factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT magalhaesr factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT appelrosp factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT korvj factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT vibor factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT minellic factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke
AT galls factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke