Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke
<h4>Objective</h4> <p>To examine factors contributing to the sex differences in functional outcomes and participation restriction after stroke.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>Individual participant data on long-term functional outcome or participation restriction...
Główni autorzy: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Język: | English |
Wydane: |
American Academy of Neurology
2018
|
_version_ | 1826283132680142848 |
---|---|
author | Phan, H Blizzard, C Reeves, M Thrift, A Cadilhac, D Sturm, J Heeley, E Otahal, P Vemmos, K Anderson, C Parmar, P Krishnamurthi, R Barker-Collo, S Feigin, V Bejot, Y Cabral, N Carolei, A Sacco, S Chausson, N Olindo, S Rothwell, P Silva, C Correia, M Magalhães, R Appelros, P Kõrv, J Vibo, R Minelli, C Gall, S |
author_facet | Phan, H Blizzard, C Reeves, M Thrift, A Cadilhac, D Sturm, J Heeley, E Otahal, P Vemmos, K Anderson, C Parmar, P Krishnamurthi, R Barker-Collo, S Feigin, V Bejot, Y Cabral, N Carolei, A Sacco, S Chausson, N Olindo, S Rothwell, P Silva, C Correia, M Magalhães, R Appelros, P Kõrv, J Vibo, R Minelli, C Gall, S |
author_sort | Phan, H |
collection | OXFORD |
description | <h4>Objective</h4> <p>To examine factors contributing to the sex differences in functional outcomes and participation restriction after stroke.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>Individual participant data on long-term functional outcome or participation restriction (i.e., handicap) were obtained from 11 stroke incidence studies (1993–2014). Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to estimate the female:male relative risk (RR) of poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2 or Barthel Index score <20) at 1 year (10 studies, n = 4,852) and 5 years (7 studies, n = 2,226). Multivariable linear regression was used to compare the mean difference (MD) in participation restriction by use of the London Handicap Scale (range 0–100 with lower scores indicating poorer outcome) for women compared to men at 5 years (2 studies, n = 617). For each outcome, study-specific estimates adjusted for confounding factors (e.g., sociodemographics, stroke-related factors) were combined with the use of random-effects meta-analysis.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>In unadjusted analyses, women experienced worse functional outcomes after stroke than men (1 year: pooled RRunadjusted 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–1.48; 5 years: RRunadjusted 1.31, 95% CI 1.16–1.47). However, this difference was greatly attenuated after adjustment for age, prestroke dependency, and stroke severity (1 year: RRadjusted 1.08, 95% CI 0.97–1.20; 5 years: RRadjusted 1.05, 95% CI 0.94–1.18). Women also had greater participation restriction than men (pooled MDunadjusted −5.55, 95% CI −8.47 to −2.63), but this difference was again attenuated after adjustment for the aforementioned factors (MDadjusted −2.48, 95% CI −4.99 to 0.03).</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>Worse outcomes after stroke among women were explained mostly by age, stroke severity, and prestroke dependency, suggesting these potential targets to improve the outcomes after stroke in women.</p> |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:54:20Z |
format | Journal article |
id | oxford-uuid:8781f86a-96fb-439e-98c1-33fd91fabac2 |
institution | University of Oxford |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:54:20Z |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | American Academy of Neurology |
record_format | dspace |
spelling | oxford-uuid:8781f86a-96fb-439e-98c1-33fd91fabac22022-03-26T22:11:11ZFactors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after strokeJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:8781f86a-96fb-439e-98c1-33fd91fabac2EnglishSymplectic Elements at OxfordAmerican Academy of Neurology2018Phan, HBlizzard, CReeves, MThrift, ACadilhac, DSturm, JHeeley, EOtahal, PVemmos, KAnderson, CParmar, PKrishnamurthi, RBarker-Collo, SFeigin, VBejot, YCabral, NCarolei, ASacco, SChausson, NOlindo, SRothwell, PSilva, CCorreia, MMagalhães, RAppelros, PKõrv, JVibo, RMinelli, CGall, S <h4>Objective</h4> <p>To examine factors contributing to the sex differences in functional outcomes and participation restriction after stroke.</p> <h4>Methods</h4> <p>Individual participant data on long-term functional outcome or participation restriction (i.e., handicap) were obtained from 11 stroke incidence studies (1993–2014). Multivariable log-binomial regression was used to estimate the female:male relative risk (RR) of poor functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score >2 or Barthel Index score <20) at 1 year (10 studies, n = 4,852) and 5 years (7 studies, n = 2,226). Multivariable linear regression was used to compare the mean difference (MD) in participation restriction by use of the London Handicap Scale (range 0–100 with lower scores indicating poorer outcome) for women compared to men at 5 years (2 studies, n = 617). For each outcome, study-specific estimates adjusted for confounding factors (e.g., sociodemographics, stroke-related factors) were combined with the use of random-effects meta-analysis.</p> <h4>Results</h4> <p>In unadjusted analyses, women experienced worse functional outcomes after stroke than men (1 year: pooled RRunadjusted 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–1.48; 5 years: RRunadjusted 1.31, 95% CI 1.16–1.47). However, this difference was greatly attenuated after adjustment for age, prestroke dependency, and stroke severity (1 year: RRadjusted 1.08, 95% CI 0.97–1.20; 5 years: RRadjusted 1.05, 95% CI 0.94–1.18). Women also had greater participation restriction than men (pooled MDunadjusted −5.55, 95% CI −8.47 to −2.63), but this difference was again attenuated after adjustment for the aforementioned factors (MDadjusted −2.48, 95% CI −4.99 to 0.03).</p> <h4>Conclusions</h4> <p>Worse outcomes after stroke among women were explained mostly by age, stroke severity, and prestroke dependency, suggesting these potential targets to improve the outcomes after stroke in women.</p> |
spellingShingle | Phan, H Blizzard, C Reeves, M Thrift, A Cadilhac, D Sturm, J Heeley, E Otahal, P Vemmos, K Anderson, C Parmar, P Krishnamurthi, R Barker-Collo, S Feigin, V Bejot, Y Cabral, N Carolei, A Sacco, S Chausson, N Olindo, S Rothwell, P Silva, C Correia, M Magalhães, R Appelros, P Kõrv, J Vibo, R Minelli, C Gall, S Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke |
title | Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke |
title_full | Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke |
title_fullStr | Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke |
title_short | Factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke |
title_sort | factors contributing to sex differences in functional outcomes and participation after stroke |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phanh factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT blizzardc factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT reevesm factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT thrifta factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT cadilhacd factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT sturmj factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT heeleye factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT otahalp factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT vemmosk factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT andersonc factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT parmarp factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT krishnamurthir factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT barkercollos factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT feiginv factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT bejoty factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT cabraln factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT caroleia factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT saccos factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT chaussonn factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT olindos factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT rothwellp factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT silvac factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT correiam factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT magalhaesr factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT appelrosp factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT korvj factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT vibor factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT minellic factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke AT galls factorscontributingtosexdifferencesinfunctionaloutcomesandparticipationafterstroke |