Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis
: A previous systematic review reported that topical NSAIDs were effective in relieving pain in chronic conditions like osteoarthritis and tendinitis. More trials, a better understanding of trial quality and bias, and a reclassification of certain drugs necessitate a new review. Methods: Studies wer...
| Format: | Journal article |
|---|---|
| Published: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
| Subjects: |
| _version_ | 1797080096067026944 |
|---|---|
| collection | OXFORD |
| description | : A previous systematic review reported that topical NSAIDs were effective in relieving pain in chronic conditions like osteoarthritis and tendinitis. More trials, a better understanding of trial quality and bias, and a reclassification of certain drugs necessitate a new review. Methods: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases, and writing to manufacturers. We identified randomised, double blind trials comparing topical NSAID with either placebo or another active treatment, in adults with chronic pain. The primary outcome was a reduction in pain of approximately 50% at two weeks, and secondary outcomes were local and systemic adverse events and adverse event-related withdrawals. Relative benefit and number-needed-to-treat (NNT), and relative harm and number-needed-to-harm (NNH) were calculated, and the effects of trial quality, validity and size, outcome reported, and condition treated, were examined by sensitivity analyses. Results: Twelve new trials were added to 13 trials from a previous review. Fourteen double blind placebo-controlled trials had information from almost 1,500 patients. Topical NSAID was significantly better than placebo with relative benefit 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.2), NNT 4.6 (95% confidence interval 3.8 to 5.9). Results were not affected by trial quality, validity or size, outcome reported, or condition treated. Three trials with 764 patients comparing a topical with an oral NSAID found no difference in efficacy. Local adverse events (6%), systemic adverse events (3%), or the numbers withdrawing due to an adverse event were the same for topical NSAID and placebo. Conclusions: Topical NSAIDs were effective and safe in treating chronic musculoskeletal conditions for two weeks. Larger and longer trials are necessary to fully elucidate the place of topical NSAIDs in clinical practice. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:55:16Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:87da5552-1c6c-45ff-9fe9-d8385cb85b8b |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:55:16Z |
| publishDate | 2004 |
| publisher | BioMed Central |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:87da5552-1c6c-45ff-9fe9-d8385cb85b8b2022-03-26T22:13:11ZTopical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysisJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:87da5552-1c6c-45ff-9fe9-d8385cb85b8bMedical sciencesOrthopaedic SurgeryOxford University Research Archive - ValetBioMed Central2004: A previous systematic review reported that topical NSAIDs were effective in relieving pain in chronic conditions like osteoarthritis and tendinitis. More trials, a better understanding of trial quality and bias, and a reclassification of certain drugs necessitate a new review. Methods: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases, and writing to manufacturers. We identified randomised, double blind trials comparing topical NSAID with either placebo or another active treatment, in adults with chronic pain. The primary outcome was a reduction in pain of approximately 50% at two weeks, and secondary outcomes were local and systemic adverse events and adverse event-related withdrawals. Relative benefit and number-needed-to-treat (NNT), and relative harm and number-needed-to-harm (NNH) were calculated, and the effects of trial quality, validity and size, outcome reported, and condition treated, were examined by sensitivity analyses. Results: Twelve new trials were added to 13 trials from a previous review. Fourteen double blind placebo-controlled trials had information from almost 1,500 patients. Topical NSAID was significantly better than placebo with relative benefit 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 2.2), NNT 4.6 (95% confidence interval 3.8 to 5.9). Results were not affected by trial quality, validity or size, outcome reported, or condition treated. Three trials with 764 patients comparing a topical with an oral NSAID found no difference in efficacy. Local adverse events (6%), systemic adverse events (3%), or the numbers withdrawing due to an adverse event were the same for topical NSAID and placebo. Conclusions: Topical NSAIDs were effective and safe in treating chronic musculoskeletal conditions for two weeks. Larger and longer trials are necessary to fully elucidate the place of topical NSAIDs in clinical practice. |
| spellingShingle | Medical sciences Orthopaedic Surgery Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic review and meta-analysis |
| title | Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic
review and meta-analysis |
| title_full | Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic
review and meta-analysis |
| title_fullStr | Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic
review and meta-analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic
review and meta-analysis |
| title_short | Topical NSAIDs for chronic musculoskeletal pain: systematic
review and meta-analysis |
| title_sort | topical nsaids for chronic musculoskeletal pain systematic review and meta analysis |
| topic | Medical sciences Orthopaedic Surgery |