Inadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a systematic review of recent trials
Background Poorly described placebo/sham controls make it difficult to appraise active intervention benefits and harms. The 12‐item Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist was developed to improve the reporting of active interventions. The extent to which TIDieR ha...
| Päätekijät: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Aineistotyyppi: | Journal article |
| Kieli: | English |
| Julkaistu: |
Wiley
2019
|
| _version_ | 1826283199757549568 |
|---|---|
| author | Webster, RK Howick, J Hoffmann, T Macdonald, H Collins, GS Rees, JL Napadow, V Madigan, C Price, A Lamb, SE Bishop, FL Bokelmann, K Papanikitas, A Roberts, N Evers, AWM |
| author_facet | Webster, RK Howick, J Hoffmann, T Macdonald, H Collins, GS Rees, JL Napadow, V Madigan, C Price, A Lamb, SE Bishop, FL Bokelmann, K Papanikitas, A Roberts, N Evers, AWM |
| author_sort | Webster, RK |
| collection | OXFORD |
| description |
Background
Poorly described placebo/sham controls make it difficult to appraise active intervention benefits and harms. The 12‐item Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist was developed to improve the reporting of active interventions. The extent to which TIDieR has been used to improve description of placebo or sham control is not known.
<br></br>Materials and methods
We systematically identified and examined all placebo/sham‐controlled randomised trials published in 2018 in the top six general medical journals. We reported how many of the TIDieR checklist items were used to describe the placebo/sham control(s). We supplemented this with a sample of 100 placebo/sham‐controlled trials from any journal and searched Google Scholar to identify placebo/sham‐controlled trials citing TIDieR.
<br></br>Results
We identified 94 placebo/sham‐controlled trials published in the top journals in 2018. None reported using TIDieR, and none reported placebo or sham components completely. On average eight TIDieR items were addressed, with placebo/sham control name (100%) and when and how much was administered (97.9%) most commonly reported. Some items (rationale, 8.5%, whether there were modifications, 25.5%) were less often reported. In our sample of less well‐cited journals, reporting was poorer (average of six items) and followed a similar pattern. Since TIDieR’s first publication, six placebo‐controlled trials have cited it according to Google Scholar. Two of these used the checklist to describe placebo controls; neither one completely desribed the placebo intervention.
<br></br>Conclusions
Placebo and sham controls are poorly described within randomised trials, and TIDieR is rarely used to guide these descriptions. We recommend developing guidelines to promote better descriptions of placebo/sham control components within clinical trials.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:55:19Z |
| format | Journal article |
| id | oxford-uuid:87df78c0-3cb5-4e65-bfa8-942da21c8b17 |
| institution | University of Oxford |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-07T00:55:19Z |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | dspace |
| spelling | oxford-uuid:87df78c0-3cb5-4e65-bfa8-942da21c8b172022-03-26T22:13:24ZInadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a systematic review of recent trialsJournal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:87df78c0-3cb5-4e65-bfa8-942da21c8b17EnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2019Webster, RKHowick, JHoffmann, TMacdonald, HCollins, GSRees, JLNapadow, VMadigan, CPrice, ALamb, SEBishop, FLBokelmann, KPapanikitas, ARoberts, NEvers, AWM Background Poorly described placebo/sham controls make it difficult to appraise active intervention benefits and harms. The 12‐item Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist was developed to improve the reporting of active interventions. The extent to which TIDieR has been used to improve description of placebo or sham control is not known. <br></br>Materials and methods We systematically identified and examined all placebo/sham‐controlled randomised trials published in 2018 in the top six general medical journals. We reported how many of the TIDieR checklist items were used to describe the placebo/sham control(s). We supplemented this with a sample of 100 placebo/sham‐controlled trials from any journal and searched Google Scholar to identify placebo/sham‐controlled trials citing TIDieR. <br></br>Results We identified 94 placebo/sham‐controlled trials published in the top journals in 2018. None reported using TIDieR, and none reported placebo or sham components completely. On average eight TIDieR items were addressed, with placebo/sham control name (100%) and when and how much was administered (97.9%) most commonly reported. Some items (rationale, 8.5%, whether there were modifications, 25.5%) were less often reported. In our sample of less well‐cited journals, reporting was poorer (average of six items) and followed a similar pattern. Since TIDieR’s first publication, six placebo‐controlled trials have cited it according to Google Scholar. Two of these used the checklist to describe placebo controls; neither one completely desribed the placebo intervention. <br></br>Conclusions Placebo and sham controls are poorly described within randomised trials, and TIDieR is rarely used to guide these descriptions. We recommend developing guidelines to promote better descriptions of placebo/sham control components within clinical trials. |
| spellingShingle | Webster, RK Howick, J Hoffmann, T Macdonald, H Collins, GS Rees, JL Napadow, V Madigan, C Price, A Lamb, SE Bishop, FL Bokelmann, K Papanikitas, A Roberts, N Evers, AWM Inadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a systematic review of recent trials |
| title | Inadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a systematic review of recent trials |
| title_full | Inadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a systematic review of recent trials |
| title_fullStr | Inadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a systematic review of recent trials |
| title_full_unstemmed | Inadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a systematic review of recent trials |
| title_short | Inadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a systematic review of recent trials |
| title_sort | inadequate description of placebo and sham controls in a systematic review of recent trials |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT websterrk inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT howickj inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT hoffmannt inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT macdonaldh inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT collinsgs inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT reesjl inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT napadowv inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT madiganc inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT pricea inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT lambse inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT bishopfl inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT bokelmannk inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT papanikitasa inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT robertsn inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials AT eversawm inadequatedescriptionofplaceboandshamcontrolsinasystematicreviewofrecenttrials |