Uber, TaskRabbit and Co: platforms as employers? rethinking the legal analysis of crowdwork
One of the key assumptions underpinning the rise of ‘crowdsourced work’ – from transport apps including Uber to online platforms such as Amazon’s Mechanical Turk – is the assertion put forward by most platforms that crowdworkers are self-employed, independent cont...
Main Authors: | Prassl, J, Risak, M |
---|---|
Format: | Journal article |
Published: |
University of Illinois College of Law
2016
|
Similar Items
-
Reversed Solutionism. The Two Sided Control of Crowdwork
by: Heiner Heiland
Published: (2019-11-01) -
Rethinking legal taxonomies for the gig economy
by: Adams, A, et al.
Published: (2018) -
The Middle Finger Response. Crowdworkers of the World United in a Gesture
by: Guido Segni
Published: (2021-03-01) -
AIRBNB AND UBER: LEGAL PLATFORM BUT ILLEGAL NETWORKED BUSINESS
by: Saša Zupan Korže
Published: (2018-05-01) -
Skills formation and skills matching in online platform work: policies and practices for promoting crowdworkers’ continuous learning (CrowdLearn)
by: Lehdonvirta, V, et al.
Published: (2019)