The ethics of crowdfunding in paediatric neurology

In the last decade, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of families resorting to internet-based public appeals to fund access to novel, highly expensive, or experimental therapies for rare disorders. Medical crowdfunding may provide a means to fund treatments or interventions, but it ra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Livingstone, A, Servais, L, Wilkinson, D
Format: Journal article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022
_version_ 1797109497984974848
author Livingstone, A
Servais, L
Wilkinson, D
author_facet Livingstone, A
Servais, L
Wilkinson, D
author_sort Livingstone, A
collection OXFORD
description In the last decade, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of families resorting to internet-based public appeals to fund access to novel, highly expensive, or experimental therapies for rare disorders. Medical crowdfunding may provide a means to fund treatments or interventions, but it raises individual and societal ethical questions. In this review, we consider the ethical challenges crowdfunding poses in paediatric neurology, drawing on the example of gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. We discuss physician responsibilities, and how neurologists should respond to crowdfunding that they encounter in clinical practice. We also briefly consider actions that can be taken by clinicians, charities, and crowdfunding websites to reduce harms. The best way to mitigate these harms may be to target the high costs and restrictive criteria that limit access to many novel treatments, and to optimize treatment utility, for instance by newborn screening.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T07:41:06Z
format Journal article
id oxford-uuid:889e4594-0d5e-4728-8765-0be44cd6dfa1
institution University of Oxford
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-07T07:41:06Z
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley
record_format dspace
spelling oxford-uuid:889e4594-0d5e-4728-8765-0be44cd6dfa12023-05-02T10:18:42ZThe ethics of crowdfunding in paediatric neurology Journal articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_dcae04bcuuid:889e4594-0d5e-4728-8765-0be44cd6dfa1EnglishSymplectic ElementsWiley2022Livingstone, AServais, LWilkinson, DIn the last decade, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of families resorting to internet-based public appeals to fund access to novel, highly expensive, or experimental therapies for rare disorders. Medical crowdfunding may provide a means to fund treatments or interventions, but it raises individual and societal ethical questions. In this review, we consider the ethical challenges crowdfunding poses in paediatric neurology, drawing on the example of gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. We discuss physician responsibilities, and how neurologists should respond to crowdfunding that they encounter in clinical practice. We also briefly consider actions that can be taken by clinicians, charities, and crowdfunding websites to reduce harms. The best way to mitigate these harms may be to target the high costs and restrictive criteria that limit access to many novel treatments, and to optimize treatment utility, for instance by newborn screening.
spellingShingle Livingstone, A
Servais, L
Wilkinson, D
The ethics of crowdfunding in paediatric neurology
title The ethics of crowdfunding in paediatric neurology
title_full The ethics of crowdfunding in paediatric neurology
title_fullStr The ethics of crowdfunding in paediatric neurology
title_full_unstemmed The ethics of crowdfunding in paediatric neurology
title_short The ethics of crowdfunding in paediatric neurology
title_sort ethics of crowdfunding in paediatric neurology
work_keys_str_mv AT livingstonea theethicsofcrowdfundinginpaediatricneurology
AT servaisl theethicsofcrowdfundinginpaediatricneurology
AT wilkinsond theethicsofcrowdfundinginpaediatricneurology
AT livingstonea ethicsofcrowdfundinginpaediatricneurology
AT servaisl ethicsofcrowdfundinginpaediatricneurology
AT wilkinsond ethicsofcrowdfundinginpaediatricneurology